Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 6281 (PNJ)

RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN v. STATE OF HARYANA

CWP/26549/2023 · 2026-08-27

Jagmohan Bansal

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Item No.112 CWP-26549-2023 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 Ravinder Kumar Jain …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Vishal Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Abhinav Kalia, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate and Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for respondent-HSIIDC *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to the respondents to release them compensation awarded vide award dated 07.08.2020 (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-HSIIDC submits that Government has approved release of compensation though at one stage there was dispute with respect to de-notification of the land in question. The petitioner shall be paid compensation, as per his entitlement, within six weeks from today. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. Let the needful be done within 6 weeks from today. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 27.08.2026 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2026.08.27 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.