Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C ) NO.25334 of 2023
Sanjeeth Kumar Panda …. Petitioner Mr. R. Mohanty, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA
COROM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 09.02.2026
W.P.(C ) NO.25334 of 2023 & I.A. NO.1035 of 2026
2. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that during pendency of the matter, Petitioner’s claim has been considered by the Promotion Adalat in presence of the competent authority and competent authority has been directed to consider the Petitioner’s claim as made in the Writ Petition. It is accordingly contended that liberty be given to the Petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition in order to approach the competent authority, basing on the order passed by the Promotion Adalat.
4. Learned Addl. Govt. Advocate has no serious objection to the course of action proposed. p. 2p. 2
4. Considering the submission, the Writ Petition stands disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to move the competent authority for getting the benefit in terms of the order passed by the promotion Adalat, if any.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
sangita
Judge