Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 6257 (PNJ)

SONU NASIR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/46981/2026 · 2026-08-27

Sumeet Goel

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-46981 243 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sonu Nasir State of Haryana Date of decision: Date of Uploading: CORAM: Present:- SUMEET GOEL BNSS, 2023 seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.0125 dated 24.03.2025, 324(4) of the BNS, 2023 Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari. 2. that the petition in hand has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner stands granted Court. 3. infructuous & stands 46981-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46981-2026 Sonu Nasir versus State of Haryana Date of decision: August 27, 2026 Date of Uploading: August 27, 2026 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Kanish Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana. ***** SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.0125 dated 24.03.2025, registered under Sections 310(2) & 324(4) of the BNS, 2023 (Section 238 of the BNS added later Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner that the petition in hand has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner stands granted concession of regular bail by the concerned Se In view of the above, main petition has been rendered infructuous & stands dismissed, accordingly. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2026 ....Petitioner ....Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Kanish Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing registered under Sections 310(2) & (Section 238 of the BNS added later on), at At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petition in hand has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner concession of regular bail by the concerned Sessions In view of the above, main petition has been rendered , accordingly. ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.08.27 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-46981-2026 2 4. Before parting with this order, it is noticeable that from the facts available, atleast for the nonce, the concerned Sessions Court has granted regular bail to the petitioner on 20.08.2026 while the petition in hand is pending adjudication before this Court. It is deemed appropriate and in the interest of justice that the concerned Sessions Court (which has afforded regular bail to the petitioner during pendency of the present petition before this Court) be directed to send a report/ explanation to this Court as to whether the said Court, while granting regular bail to the petitioner, had considered aspect of the present petition pending adjudication before this Court. 5. List for consideration of such report/ explanation on 15.09.2026. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE August 27, 2026 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.08.27 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document