Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 6230 (PNJ)

SUKHVIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/71176/2025 · 2026-08-21

Alok Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-71176 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (234) SUKHVIR SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, 1. BNSS, 2023, for quashing of FIR No. 100 dated 09.09.2024, registered under Sections 118(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station Sadar Banga, District SBS Nagar, along with therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 08.11.2024/05.12.2024 (Annexure P 2. Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, the parties have not appeared for recording their statements in terms of the compromise. 3. additional sections have also been invoked. 71176-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SUKHVIR SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Saurav Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amritpal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Kuljinder S. Billing, Advocate for the respondent No.2. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, for quashing of FIR No. 100 dated 09.09.2024, registered under Sections 118(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station Sadar Banga, District SBS Nagar, along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 08.11.2024/05.12.2024 (Annexure P-2). As per the report received from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, the parties have not appeared for recording their statements in terms of the compromise. At this stage, learned State counsel submits that certain additional sections have also been invoked. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-71176-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 21.08.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Saurav Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amritpal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Kuljinder S. Billing, Advocate for the respondent No.2. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, for quashing of FIR No. 100 dated 09.09.2024, registered under Sections 118(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station Sadar all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 08.11.2024/05.12.2024 As per the report received from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, the parties have not appeared for recording their statements in terms of the compromise. At this stage, learned State counsel submits that certain 21.08.2026 ……Petitioners ……Respondents The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, for quashing of FIR No. 100 dated 09.09.2024, registered under Sections 118(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station Sadar all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 08.11.2024/05.12.2024 As per the report received from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, the parties have not appeared for recording At this stage, learned State counsel submits that certain MANJU 2026.08.24 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-71176 4. permission to withdraw the present pe petition with better particulars. 5. withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. on the merits of learned counsel for the petitioners and does not amount to any direction. 7. from the terms of 8. August 21, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: 71176-2025 (O&M) -2- Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and that the liberty granted is only on the request of learned counsel for the petitioners and does not amount to any direction. However, respondent No. 2 shall not be permitted to from the terms of the compromise. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. August 21, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks tition with liberty to file a fresh In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion of the case and that the liberty granted is only on the request of learned counsel for the petitioners and does not amount to any direction. However, respondent No. 2 shall not be permitted to resile cation(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks tition with liberty to file a fresh In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion of the case and that the liberty granted is only on the request resile MANJU 2026.08.24 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document