CRM-M-37583- IN THE H (217) SURJEET SINGH STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. R *** MANISHA BATR 1. The Section 482 of Bh for grant of anticip registered under S 2023 (for short “B Khan, District Mo 2. The a recorded by comp morning of 25.02 present petitioner him, reached there assault upon him. opened an assault petitioner picked u -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH SINGH @ SUNDAR Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Harpreet Singh Jakhal, Advocate Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab *** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh anticipatory bail in case arising out o nder Sections 333, 118(1), 115(2), 3(5 hort “BNS”) and Section 25 of Arms ict Moga. The aforementioned FIR was registe complainat-Sandeep Singh @ Shan 25.02.2026, he was present in the tioner accompanied with Inderjit Sing d there in a car. All of them entered i him. The petitioner made an exhortat assault upon the complainant by strik icked up a kappa lying in his shop an JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-37583-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.08.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA vocate for the petitioner Punjab preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) out of FIR No.45 dated 25.02.2026 2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Arms Act at Police Station Kot Ise registered on the basis of statement Shani, alleging therein that in the n the cabin of his shop, when the it Singh and 02 persons unknown to tered inside his cabin and opened an xhortation and one unknown accused y striking blows with a stick. The op and struck blows with the same. M) 2026 nder SS”) 2026 hita, t Ise ment the the n to d an used The ame. AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-37583- On clamour being fled away. 3. After initiated and are u application for gr Learned Additiona 4. It is a falsely implicated and harass the sist of the petitioner, Feeling humiliated and then implicate attributed to the pe a self-inflicted in custodial interroga It is, thus, argued t 5. Per c report has argued levelled against th 6. This C for the parties at co -2026 (O&M) 2 being raised, some persons had reache After registration of FIR, investiga d are underway. Apprehending his a for grant of pre-arrest bail, which w ditional Sessions Judge, Moga vide ord It is argued by learned counsel for t icated in this case. In fact, it was the c he sister of the petitioner. A Panchaya ioner, who had asked the complainan iliated and offended, the complainan plicated the petitioner and other co-ac the petitioner and found on the perso ted injury. The petitioner is ready terrogation is not required. No recove rgued that the petition deserves to be al Per contra, learned State counsel rgued that taking into consideration th inst the petitioner, he does not deserve This Court has heard the rival submis es at considerable length. reached there and then the assailants vestigation proceedings have been his arrest, the petitioner moved an ich was dismissed by the Court of ide order dated 17.04.2026. l for the petitioner that he has been s the complainant who used to tease nchayat was convened by the family plainant to not to repeat such acts. lainant caused self-inflicted injuries accused in this case. The injury person of the complainant is in fact ready to join investigation. His recovery is to be effected from him. o be allowed. nsel while relying upon the status tion the gravity of the allegations as eserve to be extended benefit of bail. ubmissions made by learned counsel lants been d an rt of been tease mily ts. uries njury fact His him. tatus ns as bail. unsel AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-37583- 7. The criminally trespass by causing injury have been opined Magistrate. Given this Court is of petitioner is not re out in favour of t petitioner is order joining investigati of receipt of a ce released on bail b surety bonds to his i. ii. iii. -2026 (O&M) 3 The petitioner alongwith the co respassed into the shop of the complain injury with a kappa. The injuries foun pined to be simple in nature. The s Given the nature of the allegations as is of the considered opinion that not required. As such a case for gra ur of the petitioner. Accordingly, th ordered to be extended benefit of an stigation and surrendering within a pe f a certified copy of this order and u bail by the Investigating Officer on f s to his satisfaction and further subject i. The petitioner shall coopera shall appear before the i officer as and when required. ii. The petitioner shall not dir inducement, threat or promi with the facts of the case so disclosing such facts to the Co iii. The petitioner shall not com on bail. e co-accused is alleged to have mplainant and to have assaulted him es found on the person of the victim The subject offences are triable by ons as levelled against the petitioner, that pre-trial incarceration of the or grant of anticipatory bail is made gly, the petition is allowed and the t of anticipatory bail, subject to his in a period of 10 days from the date and upon his doing so, he shall be er on furnishing personal as well as ubject to the following conditions :- ooperate with the investigation and the investigating officer/arresting uired. ot directly or indirectly make any promise to any person acquainted ase so as to dissuade him/her from the Court or to any Police Officer. t commit any similar offence while have him ictim le by oner, the ade the o his date ll be ll as and sting any inted from hile AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-37583- 8. In ca jurisdictional Cou cancellation, if any 9. It is m the purpose of dec on the merits of th 10. Since any is rendered inf 07.08.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 4 In case of violation of any of l Court shall be empowered to , if any, and pass appropriate orders in It is made clear that any observation of deciding the present petition and t s of the case. Since the main petition has been all red infructuous. (MAN Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes Whether reportable:- Yes/No y of the above conditions, the to consider the application for ders in accordance with law. vation made herein above is only for and the same shall have no bearing een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No the for y for aring n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.