IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 CWP-1047-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 24.08.2026 Sat Parkash Garg ....Petitioner Versus ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Ashish Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner !" ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel refers to para Nos.11, 15 and 16 of the judgment passed in CWP-25633-2015 decided on 30.11.2018, where this very issue with regard to an employee not being entitled to ACP, being a promotee, was considered/granted, at par with Sh. Laxman Dass, who is his junior, for which reference is made to the seniority list, Annexure P-8. He thus states that his claim be considered in light thereof. 2. The above facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned counsel for respondent No.2 fairly states that the authority would not be averse to having a relook at the matter and reconsider it keeping in mind the submissions made hereinabove, and decide the same, expeditiously, in accordance with law, after affording a proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and uninfluenced with order impugned herein, which this Court has no MOHIT 2026.08.24 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1047-2023 (O&M) -2- reason to believe the authorities would not be addressed in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 3. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 24.08.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.08.24 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document