SHAILJA KUMARI v. HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LIMITED & ANOTHER
LPA/796/2026 · 2026-08-18
Amarinder Singh Grewal, Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 6219 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 6219 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
!
"# !$%&%"' ()* )*
! ( + * , , , , + * , AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. Sanchit Punia, Advocate for the appellant.
"#"$%%"&'(
1. In the present appeal, the challenge is to the impugned order dated 16.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge, by which, the writ petition bearing CWP No. 22929 of 2018 titled as ‘Shailja Kumari versus Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Ltd and another’ filed by the appellant (petitioner therein) has been dismissed.
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the present appeal alongwith application seeking condonation of delay in filing the main appeal, may kindly be
disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the appellant to agitate any other claim, if admissible and permissible under law, before the appropriate forum, keeping in view the observations made in the order dated 23.08.2017 passed in CWP-4728-2017. RIYA 2026.08.20 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3. Ordered accordingly.
4. Pending civil miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
, , ,
, -
./.& )0
RIYA 2026.08.20 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document