IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 224 CWP-346-2023 (O&M) Decided on : 07.08.2026 NIMIT GUPTA PROP. M/S NIMIT METAL LTD. . . . Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Prikshit Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Sonia Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4 (Legal Aid Counsel). **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite best efforts, he could not contact the petitioner-Company to obtain required instructions to plead the case. 2. Vide order dated 27.07.2026, fresh notice to the petitioner-Company was ordered to be issued. However, a perusal of the office report reveal the same has not been received back, served or otherwise. 3. In view of the circumstances and the position recorded hereinabove, this Court is left with no other option except to dispose of the writ petition for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as such. 5. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner-Company to move an appropriate application for seeking revival of the present writ petition, within a period of four weeks from today, in case, any substantive issue still exists along with a cause of action to the respective parties. (KIRTI SINGH) 07.08.2026 JUDGE mahima Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No MAHIMA 2026.08.11 09:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh