Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2023 DAILYLAW 620 (ORI)

PANKAJINI JENA v. STATE OF ODISHA

CMAPL/519/2023 · 2026-02-09

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMAPL No.519 of 2023 Pankajini Jena ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - M/s K.K. Swain, S.C Padhi, J R Khuntia -versus- State Of Odisha & others ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – Mr. U.C. Jena, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 09.02.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. The CMAPL application has been filed at the instance of the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of the F.A.O bearing F.A.O. No.6 of 2022. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State-opposite parties. Peruse the CMAPL application as well as the documents annexed thereto. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset contended that although the F.A.O was listed for hearing on 22.06.2023 before the Court of the Hon’ble the then Chief Justice, however, the petitioner missed the item in the cause list. Therefore, he could not appear before the Hon’ble Chief Justice Court on 22.06.2023. 5. He further submitted that after getting known about the Page 2 of 2. dismissal of the matter for non-prosecution, the petitioner moved the application immediately within the time period of limitation. 6. Learned counsel for the state on the other hand has no objection for restoration of the appeal. 7. Accordingly, the CMAPL stands allowed. The FAO be restored to file and placed before the assigned Bench. 8. The I.A., if any, stands disposed of. ( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra ) Judge Suchitra