Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 6170 (PNJ)

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER v. VEDPATI AND OTHERS

LPA/975/2023 · 2026-07-28

Anoop Chitkara, To Be Nominated

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 268-2 LPA No. 975 of 2023 Date of Decision: 28.07.2026 STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ......... Appellants Versus VEDPATI AND ORS ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate and Ms. Navjeet Kaur, Advocate for the respondent. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) The present Le$er Patent Appeal under Clause X of the Le$ers Patent Act for se'ng aside decision dated 19.09.2022 rendered by the learned Single Judge in CWP No. 9790 of 2016 3tled as ‘Vedpa3 and others Vs. State of Haryana and others’ under the facts and circumstances. 2. Counsel for the respondents submits that the order has been complied with. 3. State counsel does not dispute the said fact. 4. Given above, the present le$er patent appeal stands disposed of having been rendered infructuous. All pending miscellaneous applica3ons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) JUDGE 28.07.2026 Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2026.07.30 12:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.