Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 112
Rahul Yadav
State of Haryana and
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned speaking order dated 2 (Annexure P petitioner for consideration and appointment to the post of Veterinary Livestock Development Assistant (VLDA), Group No.23, under the ESM BCB category, pursuant to Advertisement N 07.03.2023 (Annexure P been made for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner against the said post/category in accordance with CWP-23092-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.23092 of 2026
Date of decision : Rahul Yadav Versus State of Haryana and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Monu, Advocate for
Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned speaking order dated 2 (Annexure P-5) passed by respondent No.2, whereby the claim of the petitioner for consideration and appointment to the post of Veterinary Livestock Development Assistant (VLDA), Group No.23, under the ESM BCB category, pursuant to Advertisement N 07.03.2023 (Annexure P-1), has been rejected. A further prayer has been made for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner against the said post/category in accordance with law and the terms and conditions of
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 23092 of 2026 (O & M) Date of decision :-28.07.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned speaking order dated 27.08.2024 5) passed by respondent No.2, whereby the claim of the petitioner for consideration and appointment to the post of Veterinary Livestock Development Assistant (VLDA), Group No.23, under the ESM BCB category, pursuant to Advertisement No.3/2023 dated 1), has been rejected. A further prayer has been made for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner against the said law and the terms and conditions of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.30 13.24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Advertisement No.3/2023 dated 07.03.2023 (Annexure P ground that the post is still lying vacant and the petitioner, being otherwise eligible and meritorious, is entitled to be considered for appointment. prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
July 28, 202 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
CWP-23092-2026 (O & M) Advertisement No.3/2023 dated 07.03.2023 (Annexure P ground that the post is still lying vacant and the petitioner, being otherwise eligible and meritorious, is entitled to be considered for appointment. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 Advertisement No.3/2023 dated 07.03.2023 (Annexure P-1), on the ground that the post is still lying vacant and the petitioner, being otherwise eligible and meritorious, is entitled to be considered for the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file fresh Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.30 13.24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document