CRM-M-11208 122 Manpreet Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. 1. Sanhita, 2023 petitioner’s representation dated 30.09.2025. 2. married with respondent No.5 in July, 2008. It was a love marriage. The matrimonial relations 03.07.2025, respondent No.5 her child of the parties, Rs.40,000/ later transpired that respondent No.5 was already the factum of her was later restore 2025 before this Court On 26.11.2025 11208-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Manpreet Singh VERSUS State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. H.S. Sandhu, Advocate for Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab *** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J.(Oral) The petition under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed for directing official respondents to decide representation dated 30.09.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was married with respondent No.5 in July, 2008. It was a love marriage. The matrimonial relations soured due to interference by respondent No.6. On 03.07.2025, respondent No.5 left the matrimonial home and took along with her child of the parties, Rs.40,000/- cash and ater transpired that respondent No.5 was already factum of her previous marriage from petitioner restored to the petitioner. Respondent No.5 filed CRWP 2025 before this Court for custody of the minor child which was declined On 26.11.2025, respondent No.5 and unknown person 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11208-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.07.2026 Petitioner Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL dvocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab. Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha directing official respondents to decide representation dated 30.09.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was married with respondent No.5 in July, 2008. It was a love marriage. The due to interference by respondent No.6. On left the matrimonial home and took along with cash and some important documents. It ater transpired that respondent No.5 was already married and she concealed from petitioner. Custody of minor son . Respondent No.5 filed CRWP-11744- for custody of the minor child which was declined. respondent No.5 and unknown persons attacked the M) .2026 Petitioner Respondents Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha directing official respondents to decide Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was married with respondent No.5 in July, 2008. It was a love marriage. The due to interference by respondent No.6. On left the matrimonial home and took along with It and she concealed stody of minor son - . attacked the KAPIL 2026.07.22 19:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-11208 petitioner. In this regar action was taken thereon. 3. 4. accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents petitioner’s consigned when petiti 5. liberty to avail appropriate accordance with law. 6. 22.07.2026 Kapil 11208-2026 (O&M) petitioner. In this regard representation dated action was taken thereon. Notice of motion to official respon Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents petitioner’s representation was received in the police st consigned when petitioner failed to join proceedings, Since petitioner representation stands determined avail appropriate remedies, as may be available to him, accordance with law. The petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : 2 d representation dated 30.09.2025 was moved but no Notice of motion to official respondents. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. He submits that was received in the police station and was oner failed to join proceedings, despite notice. Since petitioner representation stands determined, he is at , as may be available to him, in The petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Yes/No was moved but no who is present in Court, submits that ation and was e is at in (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) KAPIL 2026.07.22 19:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document