Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5993 (PNJ)

ARUN KUMAR MUTHYALA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M/45213/2023 · 2026-07-21

Sumeet Goel

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (340) CRM-M-45213-2023 Arun Kumar Muthyala and another ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh ……Respondent(s) Decided on : 21.07.2026 Date of uploading: 21.07.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Birla, Advocate for the petitioner (s). ***** Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral): 1. The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus: “It is therefore respectfully prayed for quashing the First Information Report (FIR No. 30 dt. 25.1.2018 u/s 406, 420, 120-B IPC and Section 66-C, 66-D of IT Act, registered at P.S Central Sector 17, Chandigarh) and all proceedings arise out of this FIR in accordance with the grounds mentioned in the petition as There is no prima facie material against the accused that is required to be disclosed in the FIR and on the basis of principles of natural justice and due process.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition in hand, so as to enable the petitioners to file afresh with better particulars. 3. Ordered accordingly. (SUMEET GOEL) July 21, 2026 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.21 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh