ARUN KUMAR MUTHYALA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M/45213/2023 · 2026-07-21
Sumeet Goel
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 5993 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 5993 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(340)
CRM-M-45213-2023
Arun Kumar Muthyala and another ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh
……Respondent(s)
Decided on : 21.07.2026 Date of uploading: 21.07.2026
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Birla, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
***** Sumeet Goel, J. (Oral):
1.
The substantive prayer made in the instant petition reads thus:
“It is therefore respectfully prayed for quashing the First Information Report (FIR No. 30 dt. 25.1.2018 u/s 406, 420, 120-B IPC and Section 66-C, 66-D of IT Act, registered at P.S Central Sector 17, Chandigarh) and all proceedings arise out of this FIR in accordance with the grounds mentioned in the petition as There is no prima facie material against the accused that is required to be disclosed in the FIR and on the basis of principles of natural justice and due process.”
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition in hand, so as to enable the petitioners to file afresh with better particulars.
3.
Ordered accordingly.
(SUMEET GOEL) July 21, 2026
JUDGE Naveen
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2026.07.21 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh