161 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA VIRENDER SHARMA STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : Mr. Namit Khurana, Ms. Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr. Abhimanyu Batra, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Sumeet Goel, J. 1. Present petition has 2023 for quashing an FIR No. 316(2), 318(4), 61 BNS, 2023 (corresponding Sections 406, 420, 120A & 120B IPC), 1860 Nagar as the matter has been compromised between the parties, vide Memorandum of Mutual Settlement/ Compromise dated (Annexure P-2). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition in hand with liberty to file afresh with better particulars, in terms of the dicta of the Division Bench judgment of this Court passed in titled Rakesh Das v. State of Har 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 21.07.2026 Vandana Yadav IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of Decision : Date of uploading: VIRENDER SHARMA ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms. Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr. Abhimanyu Batra, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** , J.(Oral) Present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 for quashing an FIR No.0164 dated 12.03.2026 316(2), 318(4), 61 BNS, 2023 (corresponding Sections 406, 420, 120A & 120B IPC), 1860 at Police Station Yamuna Nagar City, District Yamuna as the matter has been compromised between the parties, vide Memorandum of Mutual Settlement/ Compromise dated 2). Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition in hand with liberty to file afresh with better particulars, in terms of the dicta of the Division Bench judgment of this Court passed in Rakesh Das v. State of Haryana and another Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39133-2026 Date of Decision : 21.07.2026 Date of uploading: ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) SUMEET GOEL for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior DAG, Haryana. Mr. Abhimanyu Batra, Advocate, for respondent No.2. been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, 12.03.2026, registered under Section 316(2), 318(4), 61 BNS, 2023 (corresponding Sections 406, 420, 120A & Yamuna Nagar City, District Yamuna as the matter has been compromised between the parties, vide Memorandum of Mutual Settlement/ Compromise dated 12.05.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition in hand with liberty to file afresh with better particulars, in terms of the dicta of the Division Bench judgment of this Court passed in CRM-M-48043-2023, yana and another, decided on 12.11.2024. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, , registered under Section 316(2), 318(4), 61 BNS, 2023 (corresponding Sections 406, 420, 120A & Yamuna Nagar City, District Yamuna as the matter has been compromised between the parties, vide .2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition in hand with liberty to file afresh with better particulars, in terms of the dicta , VANDANA YADAV 2026.07.21 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document