IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 304 Ranveer Singh State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL 1. FIR No.162 BNS, 2023, Police Station Baragudha Section 25 of Arms Act and investigation. 2. order was passed: IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32988 Date of decision: Ranveer Singh V/S Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. K.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Satbir Singh Gill, Advocate for the complainant. **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail dated 14.11.2025, under Section , Police Station Baragudha, District Sirsa. Offences under Section 25 of Arms Act and Section 61(2) of BNS were added during investigation. This is the first petition for anticipatory While issuing notice of motion passed:- “ Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that although an offence under Section 109 of BNS has been invoked in the FIR in question, yet, there is no injury caused to anyone in the occurrence question; that pistol shot has also not been a the petitioner; that the petitioner has been falsely IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 32988-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.07.2026 …Petitioner …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL for the petitioner. Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. Singh Gill, Advocate for the complainant. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case arising out of , under Sections 109(1) and 111(2) of , District Sirsa. Offences under Section 61(2) of BNS were added during anticipatory bail. on 05.06.2026, following Learned counsel for the petitioner has inter alia although an offence under Section 109 of FIR in question, yet, there is no injury caused to anyone in the occurrence in question; that pistol shot has also not been attributed to that the petitioner has been falsely KAPIL 2026.07.15 19:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-32988- petitione -2026 (O&M) implicated in the FIR in question on statement of his co-accused Lovepreet Singh who was allegedly implicated on the disclosure statement of the accused Rambaksh; that 4 accus have already been arrested; that pistol allegedly used in the occurrence in question has already been recovered by the co-accused Rambaksh and therefore no any incriminating article has to be effected from the petitioner; that the petitioner is permanent resident of District Mansa in Punjab and is ready to join investigation and further to cooperate with the investigating agency on all material counts. Notice of motion. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl.A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the State of Haryana and prays for time to file a status report. At 15.07.2026 for the said purpose. However, without commenting anything upon merits of the FIR/matter in question but considering the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the totality of the facts/circumstances of the the petitioner is directed to join investigation with the concerned investigating officer within seven days from today. It is also ordered that in the the FIR in question, he shall be to the satisfaction of such officer. However, on he shall comply with the term/s and condition/s contained in Section 480(3) and 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.” implicated in the FIR in question on the disclosure accused Lovepreet Singh who was allegedly implicated on the disclosure statement of the Rambaksh; that 4 accused of the present matter arrested; that pistol allegedly used in already been recovered by accused Rambaksh and therefore no recovery of any incriminating article has to be effected from the r; that the petitioner is permanent resident of Punjab and is ready to join investigation and further to cooperate with the investigating agency on all material counts. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl.A.G., Haryana, accepts behalf of the State of Haryana and prays for his request, adjourned to 15.07.2026 for the said purpose. However, without commenting anything upon FIR/matter in question but considering the counsel for the petitioner and the totality of the facts/circumstances of the present case, the petitioner is directed to join investigation with the concerned investigating officer within seven days from ordered that in the event of his arrest in the FIR in question, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of such officer. However, on such bail, he shall comply with the term/s and condition/s contained Section 480(3) and 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik -2- KAPIL 2026.07.15 19:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-32988- 3. Vide order dated petitioner was granted interim bail and was directed to join investigation. 4. Superintendent of Police Sadar learned State counsel, which is taken on record. He submits that petitioner has joined investigation investigation 5. behalf of the today, which is taken on record 6. this Court dated without commenting on merits, the petition is allowed and order dated 05.06.2026, granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. 15.07.2026 Kapil -2026 (O&M) Vide order dated 05.06.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner was granted interim bail and was directed to join investigation. Status report by way of affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police Sadar Sirsa, District Sirsa learned State counsel, which is taken on record. He submits that petitioner has joined investigation and is not required for any further investigation. Mr. Satbir Singh Gill, Advocate has put in appearance on ehalf of the complainant and filed his power of attorney today, which is taken on record. Petitioner has joined investigation pursuant to order of Court dated 05.06.2026. In the circumstances of the case but without commenting on merits, the petition is allowed and order dated , granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) ya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable passed by this Court, the petitioner was granted interim bail and was directed to join Status report by way of affidavit of Deputy Sirsa, District Sirsa has been filed by learned State counsel, which is taken on record. He submits that and is not required for any further , Advocate has put in appearance on power of attorney in Court Petitioner has joined investigation pursuant to order of In the circumstances of the case but without commenting on merits, the petition is allowed and order dated , granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) ya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No -3- KAPIL 2026.07.15 19:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document