Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5790 (PNJ)

KRISHNA v. STATEN DER KUMAR GUPTA

COCP/3125/2026 · 2026-07-13

Amarjot Bhatti

Contempt Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (107) Krishna Satender Kumar Gupta and CORAM : Present: AMARJOT 1. contempt petition for violating the directions given in CRM 2023, decided on 12.09.2024 (Annexure P Haryana and another 2. approach the competent authority petitioner/complainant contempt petition, no such representation is 3. that he does not want to pursue the present contempt petition and accordingly withdraws the same. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus Satender Kumar Gupta and others HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Mr. Vikram Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Yadav, DAG, Haryana ***** AMARJOT BHATTI(Oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the present contempt petition for violating the directions given in CRM 2023, decided on 12.09.2024 (Annexure P- Haryana and another’. As per this order, the liberty was granted to the petitioner to approach the competent authority in case there is any threat perception to the complainant or his family member(s) contempt petition, no such representation is annexed. At this stage, learned counsel representing the petitioner states that he does not want to pursue the present contempt petition and accordingly withdraws the same. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.3125 of 2026 Decided on : 13.07.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondent(s) AMARJOT BHATTI for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Yadav, DAG, Haryana Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the present contempt petition for violating the directions given in CRM-M-65446 of -1) titled “Krishna vs. State of order, the liberty was granted to the petitioner to n case there is any threat perception to the or his family member(s). Along with the present annexed. At this stage, learned counsel representing the petitioner states that he does not want to pursue the present contempt petition and ……Petitioner ……Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the present 65446 of titled “Krishna vs. State of order, the liberty was granted to the petitioner to n case there is any threat perception to the . Along with the present At this stage, learned counsel representing the petitioner states that he does not want to pursue the present contempt petition and NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP No.3125 of 2026 -2- 4. In view of the above statement, present contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) July 13, 2026 JUDGE nt Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.14 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document