SUDHIR KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ORS.
RSA/3445/2023 · 2026-07-14
Deepak Gupta
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 5786 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 5786 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-3445-2023 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-3445-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026 Sudhir Kumar and another ...Appellants Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants – plain8ffs submits that the ques8on of law involved in the present appeal as to whether the jurisdic8on of the Civil Court is barred in view of Sec8on 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has since been decided by a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 14.05.2025 passed in Mahesh Kumar versus Sub Divisional Officer and another, reported in 2025(3) RCR (Civil) 303.
2.
Learned counsel submits that in view of the aforesaid circumstances, appellants – plain8ffs may be granted permission to withdraw the present appeal as well as the suit itself with liberty to avail the remedy as available to them in accordance with law.
3. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by counsel for the appellants, the present appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn along with the main suit with liberty to the plain8ffs to avail the remedies available to them in accordance with law. 14.07.2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No YOGESH MEHTA 2026.07.14 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document