HARSH LUTHRA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CWP/2291/2023 · 2026-07-14
Aman Chaudhary
Civil Appealbody2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 5784 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 5784 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 236 CWP-2291-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026 Harsh Luthra and Others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate for respondent No.2 ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel submits that the claim of the petitioners for regularisation was rejected vide the impugned order dated 13.05.2021, Annexure P-11 on the premise of pendency of SLP-31566-2018, which now stands decided along with a batch of other cases, on 16.04.2026 in Civil Appeal No.1998-2024. He further states that a Departmental Committee constituted for considering the cases of genuineness of claim of regularisation and has recommended claim of the petitioners and prays that a decision thereon be taken.
2. Learned State counsel on instructions states that a decision in that regard shall be taken within a period of 3 months.
3. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioners are found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to them and shall contain reasons, whereupon they shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE 14.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.14 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document