143 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20533-2023 Date of decision :13.07.2026 SATNAM SINGH BHULLAR ... Petitioner Versus KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. KPS Dhaliwal, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Dutta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nitin Ahluwalia, Advocate for the respondent-Bank. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is for quashing of the summoning order dated 26.07.2022 (Annexure P-5) passed by the JMIC, U.T., Chandigarh and the complaint No.NACT/4643/2022 dated 26.07.2022 titled Kotak Mahindra Bank Vs. Satnam Singh along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. Mr. Nitin Ahluwalia, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent/Bank and has filed his Memorandum of Appearance. The same is taken on record. He states that the matter stands settled and the petitioner has already made requisite payment. An NoC has also been issued to him. They shall withdraw the complaint on the next date of hearing. Heard. JITESH LAL 2026.07.14 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-20533-2023 -2- Keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-Bank, the present petition is disposed of with the liberty to the respondent-Bank to withdraw the complaint forthwith. Needless to say, in case the said complaint is not withdrawn, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the present petition. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 13.07.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.07.14 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document