207 ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS STATE OF CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CM-4400 days in filing the appeal. supported by an affidavit filing the appeal, LPA-1745 1. dated 20.09.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP NO.7825 of 2016. 2. that Letter/Circular No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-174 Date of Decision : ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. Sajjan Singh, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Aman Mittal, DAG Haryana. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 0-LPA-2023 Present application has been filed for condoning the delay of days in filing the appeal. Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the application supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and the delay of filing the appeal, is condoned. 1745-2023 (O&M) In the present appeal, challenge is to the impugned judgment dated 20.09.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP NO.7825 of At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents that Letter/Circular No.6/7/2014-1GSI dated 16.06.2014, a copy whereof has IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 45-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.07.2026 ........Appellants VERSUS HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL r. Sajjan Singh, Advocate for the appellants. Aman Mittal, DAG Haryana. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) been filed for condoning the delay of Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the application is allowed and the delay of 10 days in In the present appeal, challenge is to the impugned judgment dated 20.09.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP NO.7825 of learned counsel for the respondents-State submits 1GSI dated 16.06.2014, a copy whereof has been filed for condoning the delay of 10 Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the application days in In the present appeal, challenge is to the impugned judgment dated 20.09.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP NO.7825 of ubmits 1GSI dated 16.06.2014, a copy whereof has SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.14 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA-1745-2023 (O&M) -2- been appended as Annexure P-3 and which forms the basis of the relief claimed in the present appeal, has already been quashed by this Court in CWP No. 22592 of 2015 titled “Munish Gupta and others vs. State of Haryana and others”, decided on 28.01.2026. It is, therefore, contended that once the very basis of the claim has ceased to exist, the present appeal does not survive. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants does not dispute the aforesaid submission. 4. Accordingly, in view of the fact that the very basis of the present appeal i.e. Letter/Circular No. 6/7/2014-1GSI dated 16.06.2014 (Annexure P-3) has already been quashed by a competent Court of law, the prayer raised in the present appeal cannot be accepted. Consequently, the present appeal stands dismissed. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 10-07-2026 Sapna Goyal (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.14 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document