Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5706 (PNJ)

GURSEWAK SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/19355/2026 · 2026-07-09

Sumeet Goel

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----19355 19355 19355 19355 157 157 157 157 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Gursewak Singh and others State of Punjab Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: Present Present Present Present: SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL 2023 seeking quashing of the FIR Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 324(4), 191(3), and 190 of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station proceedings arising therein on account of compromise undertaking/ affidavits dated 13.02.2025 and 14.02.2025 arrived and executed between 2. No.2 has submitted before this Court that there 19355 19355 19355 19355----2026 2026 2026 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----19355 19355 19355 19355----2026 2026 2026 2026 Gursewak Singh and others versus Punjab and others Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: July 09 July 09 July 09 July 09, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: July 09 July 09 July 09 July 09, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. K.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab. Mr. Bhupender Ghangas, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate for respondents No.3, 5, 6 & 7. ***** ***** ***** ***** SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under Section seeking quashing of the FIR No.10 dated 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 324(4), 191(3), and 190 of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station Phase 1, District SAS Nagar and all consequential proceedings arising therein on account of compromise undertaking/ affidavits dated 13.02.2025 and 14.02.2025 arrived and executed between both the parties with mutual consent and sweet will. Faced with the situation that learned counsel for respondent No.2 has submitted before this Court that there 1111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH 2026 2026 2026 2026 ....Petitioners ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab. Mr. Bhupender Ghangas, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate petition has been filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, dated 15.01.2025, registered under 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 324(4), 191(3), and 190 of the BNS, Phase 1, District SAS Nagar and all consequential proceedings arising therein on account of compromise in the shape of undertaking/ affidavits dated 13.02.2025 and 14.02.2025 arrived and both the parties with mutual consent and sweet will. Faced with the situation that learned counsel for respondent No.2 has submitted before this Court that there is no valid subsisting s s of the BNSS, , registered under 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 324(4), 191(3), and 190 of the BNS, Phase 1, District SAS Nagar and all consequential f undertaking/ affidavits dated 13.02.2025 and 14.02.2025 arrived and Faced with the situation that learned counsel for respondent no valid subsisting MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.09 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----19355 19355 19355 19355----2026 2026 2026 2026 2222 compromise between the parties. Learned counsel seeks to withdraw the petition in hand. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE July 09 July 09 July 09 July 09, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.09 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment