304. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Jeetu State of Haryana CORAM: Present: SURYA PARTAP SINGH 1. under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, in a case arising out of FIR No. offence punishable under Sections (added lateron) Station Dharuhera, District Rewari. 2. interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus Haryana HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Mr. Gurdeep Singh Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG, Haryana. ----- SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for anticipatory bail, filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, in a case arising out of FIR No.23, dated 28.01.2026 offence punishable under Sections 115, 117(2), 190, 191(3), 351(2) and 109 (added lateron) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Dharuhera, District Rewari. Vide order dated 22.05.2026, the petitioner was admitted to rim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29906-2026 Date of decision: 08.07.2026 .... Petitioner .... Respondent SURYA PARTAP SINGH , Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition for anticipatory bail, filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, in a 28.01.2026, for the commission of 115, 117(2), 190, 191(3), 351(2) and 109 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, registered at Police .05.2026, the petitioner was admitted to rim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall This is a petition for anticipatory bail, filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, in a n of 115, 117(2), 190, 191(3), 351(2) and 109 Police .05.2026, the petitioner was admitted to rim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.09 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-29906-2026 - 2 - 3. Reply has been filed by learned State counsel. The same be taken on record. 4. Heard. 5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 22.05.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 22.05.2026, be made absolute. 6. The learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Satinder, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required. 7. The record has been perused carefully. 8. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled for anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 22.05.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE July 08, 2026 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.07.09 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document