CWP-15381 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (218) Deepak Jain District Magistrate and Chairman Appellate Tribunal, Yamunanagar CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. behalf of the petitioner, today in the Court. 2. had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 3. not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition, any longer. 4. except to dismiss 5. writ petition revived, by moving apt motion, in case, any cause of action still survives. November 1 Manpreet 15381-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Deepak Jain Versus District Magistrate and Chairman Appellate Tribunal, Yamunanagar and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the petitioner. Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana Mr. Udit Garg, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. None for respondent No.5. Ms. Vaishali Kamboj, Advocate for respondent No.6. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) The case was called twice. No one has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner, today in the Court. Perusal of file reveals that since had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. At this stage, this Court, can safely presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition, any longer. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option dismiss the instant writ petition for want of prosecution. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner writ petition revived, by moving apt motion, in case, any cause of action still 18, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15381-2023 Date of Decision : 18.11.2025 …Petitioner Versus District Magistrate and Chairman Appellate ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Udit Garg, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. Ms. Vaishali Kamboj, Advocate for respondent No.6. The case was called twice. No one has caused appearance on since the last three occasions, no one safely presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the instant writ petition, any longer. this Court is left with no other option for want of prosecution. to the petitioner, to get the instant writ petition revived, by moving apt motion, in case, any cause of action still (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No The case was called twice. No one has caused appearance on the last three occasions, no one safely presume that the petitioner is this Court is left with no other option , to get the instant writ petition revived, by moving apt motion, in case, any cause of action still MANPREET SINGH 2025.11.19 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment