Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5663 (MAD)

Archana v. Sababathy

CRP/256/2023 · 2026-08-18

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRP No.256 of 2023 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Civil Revision Petition No.256 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.2095 of 2023 Archana D/o.Ashokan ..Petitioner Vs Sababathy S/o.Selvaraj ..Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 07.11.2022 passed in I.A.No.89 of 2020 in GWOP No.70 of 2020 by learned Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai. For Petitioner : S.Dharmakkan ***** ORDER This civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 07.11.2022 passed in I.A.No.89 of 2020 in GWOP No.70 of 2020 by learned Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai, wherein the application filed by the respondent came to be disposed of by permitting the respondent to meet his son every Sunday at 11.00 a.m. and spend time till 4.00 p.m. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.256 of 2023 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and carefully perused the materials available on record. This Court also went through the impugned order. 3. The respondent filed a petition under Section 25 of Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 and sought for custody of the minor child. Pending the main petition, I.A.No.89 of 2020 was filed to grant visitation rights. The Court below, on considering the stand taken by both sides, came to a conclusion that the respondent will be entitled to meet his minor son every Sunday at 11.00 a.m. and spend time till 4.00 p.m. This order has been put to challenge by the petitioner, who is the wife of the respondent. 4. There is a matrimonial dispute between the parties and the respondent is after all the father of the minor son. Hence, the interim arrangement made by the Court below is for the welfare of the child since the child has to get the love and affection of both father and mother. The order passed by the Court below does not suffer from any perversity warranting interference of this Court. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 18-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.256 of 2023 __________ Page3 of 4 To The Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.256 of 2023 __________ Page4 of 4 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. gm Civil Revision Petition No.256 of 2023 18-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis