Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5626 (PNJ)

TARSEM SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/15609/2026 · 2026-07-03

Manisha Batra

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-15609 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (204 ) TARSEM SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. J.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. registered under Sections 140(3), 308(2), 351(2), 351(3), 191(3) and 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) Arms Act at Police Station Amir Khas, District Fazilka. 2. Vide order dated petitioner was released on interim bail and was directed to join investigation. However, he could not join the investigation and vide order 15609-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision : 03.07.2026 TARSEM SINGH Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. J.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. registered under Sections 140(3), 308(2), 351(2), 351(3), 191(3) and 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) Arms Act at Police Station Amir Khas, District Fazilka. Vide order dated 23.03.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner was released on interim bail and was directed to join However, he could not join the investigation and vide order IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-15609-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.07.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. J.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner Through the instant petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.69 dated 06.08.2025 registered under Sections 140(3), 308(2), 351(2), 351(3), 191(3) and 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) and Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act at Police Station Amir Khas, District Fazilka. 6 passed by this Court, the petitioner was released on interim bail and was directed to join However, he could not join the investigation and vide order AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.03 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-15609 dated 27.05.2026 passed by this Court, he was again investigation. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions states that the petitioner has joined the investigation on not required. 4. In investigation and given the nature of allegations, his pre is not required. As such, without commenting on merits of case, it is observed that a case for release of petitioner on anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the pet interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of BNSS. 5. Since the main petition application, if any, is 03.07.2026 Amit Sharma 15609-2026 (O&M) (2) dated 27.05.2026 passed by this Court, he was again Learned State counsel on instructions states that the petitioner joined the investigation on 05.06.2026 and his custodial interrogation is view of the fact that the petitioner has already joine investigation and given the nature of allegations, his pre is not required. As such, without commenting on merits of case, it is observed that a case for release of petitioner on anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and the order interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of BNSS. Since the main petition has been disposed of, application, if any, is rendered infructuous. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No dated 27.05.2026 passed by this Court, he was again directed to join Learned State counsel on instructions states that the petitioner his custodial interrogation is view of the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation and given the nature of allegations, his pre-trial incarceration is not required. As such, without commenting on merits of case, it is observed that a case for release of petitioner on anticipatory bail is made ition is allowed and the order 23.03.2026 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of BNSS. has been disposed of, pending (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.03 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.