IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106/81 CWP-2649-2023 Date of Decision: 02.07.2026 Azad Ahmed …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Anas Ahmed, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Abhinash Jain, Additional Advocate General, Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that in view of subsequent development(s), the petition has rendered infructuous. 2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 02.07.2026 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2026.07.03 13:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.