Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 30733 of 2023 Abhaya Kumar Mohanty ..... Petitioner Mr. S. Patra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 17.02.2026 Order No. 06 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. S. Patra, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. C.K. Pradhan, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. The present writ petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner therefore prays that, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue appropriate Writ/Writ(s) in the nature of writs of certiorari quashing the Order dtd.20.05.2023 under Annexure-9 after declaring the same as illegal. And further be pleased to issue appropriate Writ/Writ(s) in the nature of writs of Mandamus directing the Opposite Parties to allow pension to the petitioner after regularizing his service at least one day with all consequential benefits along with 12% interest. Page 2 of 2. And pass any other order/orders as would be deemed fit and proper. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall ever pray.” 4. It is fairly contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Parties that the issue involved in the present case is covered by an order passed by this Court on 30.09.2022 in W.P.(C) No. 24177 of 2022 (Debadhi Sahoo Vs. State of Odisha & Ors.). 5. Considering the submission made, this Court while quashing impugned order dtd.20.05.2023 under Annexure-9, dispose of the writ petition in the light of the order dtd.30.09.2022 so passed in the case of Debadhi Sahoo as cited (supra). 6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha