CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----32398 32398 32398 32398---- 121 121 121 121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ravi @ Rabi @ Kartus State of Haryana Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: Present: Present: Present: Present:- SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL 2023 for quashing of passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, whereby, bail granted to the petitioner by this Court in CRM 10.02.2026 (Annex under Sections 20(C)/ 29/ 61/ 85 of the NDPS Act, 1985, at Police Station Sadar Narwana, District Jind has been cancelled and forfeited to the State. 2. petitioner was dated 10.02.2026 ----2026 2026 2026 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----32398 32398 32398 32398----2026 2026 2026 2026 Ravi @ Rabi @ Kartus versus Haryana Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: July 01 July 01 July 01 July 01, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: July 01 July 01 July 01 July 01, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. D.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG Haryana. ***** ***** ***** ***** SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed under 2023 for quashing of the impugned order dated 02.04.2026 (Annexure P learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, whereby, bail granted to the petitioner by this Court in CRM-M 10.02.2026 (Annexure P-2) in FIR No.169 dated 29.05.2025, registered under Sections 20(C)/ 29/ 61/ 85 of the NDPS Act, 1985, at Police Station Sadar Narwana, District Jind has been cancelled and forfeited to the State. It is not in dispute between le petitioner was afforded concession of regular bail by this Court, dated 10.02.2026 passed in CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----6600 6600 6600 6600----2026 2026 2026 2026 1111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT AT AT AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH 2026 2026 2026 2026 ….Petitioner ….Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL for the petitioner. Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG Haryana. under Section 528 of the BNSS, the impugned order dated 02.04.2026 (Annexure P-4) learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, whereby, bail granted to M-6600-2026, vide order dated 2) in FIR No.169 dated 29.05.2025, registered under Sections 20(C)/ 29/ 61/ 85 of the NDPS Act, 1985, at Police Station Sadar Narwana, District Jind has been cancelled and his bonds stands between learned rival counsels that the afforded concession of regular bail by this Court, vide order 2026 2026 2026 2026. 1111 Petitioner ….Respondent 528 of the BNSS, 4) learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, whereby, bail granted to 2026, vide order dated 2) in FIR No.169 dated 29.05.2025, registered under Sections 20(C)/ 29/ 61/ 85 of the NDPS Act, 1985, at Police Station his bonds stands that the vide order MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.01 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2222 CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----32398 32398 32398 32398----2026 2026 2026 2026 3. The said bail got cancelled by the concerned Court on 02.04.2026 as the petitioner did not file requisite undertaking/ affidavit before the said Court. The petitioner was subsequently taken into custody on 28.04.2026 and is stated to be in continuous custody since then. 4. Since cancellation of bail is primarily based upon non- compliance at the end of the petitioner in furnishing requisite affidavit/ undertaking which, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, shall be scrupulously done, this Court deems it appropriate to release the petitioner on regular bail. 5. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of disposed of disposed of disposed of. Petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, if not required in any other case, on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Ld. concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate, the petitioner shall remain bound by the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not mis-use the liberty granted. (ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence, oral or documentary, during the trial. (iii) The petitioner shall not absent himself on any date before the trial. (iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. (v) The petitioner shall deposit his passport, if any, with the trial Court. (vi) The petitioner shall give his cellphone number to the Investigating Officer/SHO of concerned Police Station and shall not change his cell-phone number without prior permission of the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate. (vii) The petitioner shall not in any manner try to delay the trial. (viii) The petitioner shall submit, on the first working day of every month, an affidavit, before the concerned trial Court, to the effect that he has not been involved in commission of any offence after being released on bail. MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.01 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 3333 CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----32398 32398 32398 32398----2026 2026 2026 2026 In case the petitioner is found to be involved in any offence after his being enlarged on bail in the present FIR, on the basis of his affidavit or otherwise, the State is mandated to move, forthwith, for cancellation of his bail which plea, but of course, shall be ratiocinated upon merits thereof. 6. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those which may be imposed by concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate as directed hereinabove or upon showing any other sufficient cause, the State/complainant shall be at liberty to move cancellation of bail of the petitioner. 7. Ordered accordingly. 8. Nothing said hereinabove shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 9. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off. ((((SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL)))) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE July 01 July 01 July 01 July 01, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.07.01 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment