CRM-M-34112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (208) Karan State of Haryana CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. 2023, read with Section 439 of Cr.P.C., regular bail in case FIR No. 115, 117(2), 126 323, 341 of registered at Police Station 2. FIR, the petitioner 3. petitioner submits that any specific role has been attributed to him. transpired that 34112-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus Haryana HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Ashish Sindher, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) Through the instant petition filed under Section 4 read with Section 439 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner regular bail in case FIR No.50 dated 20.02.2026 115, 117(2), 126(2), 118(1), 238 and 110 of BNS 323, 341 of IPC, Sections 325, 324 and 308 of IPC, added later on), registered at Police Station Taraori, Karnal, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner petitioner was arrested on 21.03.2026 On asking for the relief of regular bail, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the petitioner any specific role has been attributed to him. transpired that the petitioner was empty handed at the time of occurrence 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34112-2026 Date of Decision : 24.06.2026 …Petitioner ...Respondent KULDEEP TIWARI , Advocate , DAG, Haryana. filed under Section 483 of BNSS, the petitioner has prayed for grant of 20.02.2026 under Sections 190, 191(3), (2), 118(1), 238 and 110 of BNS (earlier Sections 149, 148, Sections 325, 324 and 308 of IPC, added later on), Karnal, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the instant 21.03.2026. On asking for the relief of regular bail, learned counsel for the the petitioner has been named in the FIR, nor any specific role has been attributed to him. Even, during the investigation, it was empty handed at the time of occurrence and of BNSS, for grant of 190, 191(3), 9, 148, Sections 325, 324 and 308 of IPC, added later on), submits that in the instant On asking for the relief of regular bail, learned counsel for the has been named in the FIR, nor Even, during the investigation, it and MANPREET SINGH 2026.06.24 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-34112 the only allegation against him is that injured/victim 4. of regular bail to the petitioner, and certificate dated is taken on record, which reflects that the petitioner has suffered incarceratio of 03 months and 5. Investigating Officer concerned, the instant case submitted before the injured has head. He fairly submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case, except the instant 6. causing knife blow injury are there. in the FIR, and the name of the in the FIR. The petitioner is alleged to have caused fist blows and slap, which resulted into and has undergone incarceration of 03 months and 02 days custody certificate 7. Court is of the considered opinion that stage and charges are yet to be framed, therefore, petitioner would not serve any purpose. allowed. 34112-2026 the only allegation against him is that he gave fist blows and slap to the /victim. On the other hand, learned State counsel of regular bail to the petitioner, and has also placed on record the custody certificate dated 23.06.2026, qua the petitioner, today in the Court. The same is taken on record, which reflects that the petitioner has suffered incarceratio months and 02 days, including remission Learned State counsel on instructions imparted to him from the Investigating Officer concerned, submits that the instant case. However, final report against the petitioner has already been submitted before the trial Court concerned has suffered a serious head injury, resulting into 22 stitches on his head. He fairly submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case, instant FIR. From perusal of the FIR, it refle causing knife blow injury are there. However, Mohit and Ninza were named in the FIR, and the name of the present petitioner does not The petitioner is alleged to have caused fist blows and slap, which resulted into simply injury. Furthermore, the petitioner has clean antecedents, and has undergone incarceration of 03 months and 02 days custody certificate. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, Court is of the considered opinion that since the investigation is at the initial stage and charges are yet to be framed, therefore, would not serve any purpose. Acco 2 he gave fist blows and slap to the earned State counsel has opposed the grant has also placed on record the custody the petitioner, today in the Court. The same is taken on record, which reflects that the petitioner has suffered incarceratio , including remission. on instructions imparted to him from the submits that charges are yet to be framed in owever, final report against the petitioner has already been erned. He further submits that the suffered a serious head injury, resulting into 22 stitches on his head. He fairly submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case, From perusal of the FIR, it reflects that the allegations of However, Mohit and Ninza were named petitioner does not found mentioned The petitioner is alleged to have caused fist blows and slap, which simply injury. Furthermore, the petitioner has clean antecedents, and has undergone incarceration of 03 months and 02 days, as per the iew the facts and circumstances of the case, this since the investigation is at the initial stage and charges are yet to be framed, therefore, further incarceration of the Accordingly, the instant petition is he gave fist blows and slap to the has opposed the grant has also placed on record the custody the petitioner, today in the Court. The same is taken on record, which reflects that the petitioner has suffered incarceration on instructions imparted to him from the charges are yet to be framed in owever, final report against the petitioner has already been He further submits that the suffered a serious head injury, resulting into 22 stitches on his head. He fairly submits that the petitioner is not involved in any other case, cts that the allegations of However, Mohit and Ninza were named found mentioned The petitioner is alleged to have caused fist blows and slap, which simply injury. Furthermore, the petitioner has clean antecedents, , as per the this since the investigation is at the initial further incarceration of the petition is MANPREET SINGH 2026.06.24 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-34112 8. bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/trial Court/Duty Magistrate 9. the merits of the case and is meant for deciding the present petition only. June 24, 2026 Manpreet 34112-2026 The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned However, anything observed herein the merits of the case and is meant for deciding the present petition only. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 3 ordered to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial concerned. hereinabove shall have no effect on the merits of the case and is meant for deciding the present petition only. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No ordered to be released on bail on furnishing of bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial above shall have no effect on MANPREET SINGH 2026.06.24 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment