IN THE 208 Jagir Singh @ Jagira State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Ms. Mr. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik petitioner in case Sections 316(2), Sanhita, 2023 at 2. Learned that the case of accused Jagtar Si granted by this Court 2026. She further are identical and ‘fard’ had been in any other criminal 3. Learned 4. I have respective parties the present petition. THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33323 Date of decision: Jagira Singh VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD Ms. Tanvi Dhull, Advocate for Mr. Lakshay Bector, Advocate the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant first petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for case bearing FIR No.200 dated 318(4), 61(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3), at Police Station Dugri, District Ludhiana Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would be very similar Singh @ Bunty to whom concession Court vide order dated 19.05.2026 further contends that the allegations levelled and that he was only a witness to the used. She further contends that criminal case. Learned State Counsel he does not dispute have heard learned counsel appearing parties and have gone through the documents petition. PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 33323-2026(O&M) decision: 15.06.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ petitioner. Punjab. filed under Section 483 of the grant of regular bail to the 19.11.2025 registered under 336(3), 340(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Ludhiana. behalf of the petitioner contends similar to the case of the co- concession of regular bail has been 19.05.2026 passed in CRM-M-27397- levelled against the petitioner the agreement in which a fake the petitioner is not involved dispute the aforesaid facts. appearing on behalf of the documents appended alongwith SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.06.15 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 208 CRM-M-33323-2026(O&M) 5. In view of the facts noticed above and taking into consideration the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner, nature of allegations levelled against him, his clean antecedents as well as the fact that co-accused of the petitioner i.e. Jagtar Singh @ Bunty has already been granted the concession of regular bail vide order dated 19.05.2026 passed in CRM-M-27397-2026, I deem it appropriate to allow the present petition. 6. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 8. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 15.06.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.06.15 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document