Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5566 (PNJ)

JASVIR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CRM-M/11063/2026 · 2026-05-26

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-11063 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 314 JASVIR SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Jasinder Singh Sekhon, Ms. Amrit Kaur Mahir, AAG, Punjab Mr. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 28.08.2016 (Annexure P registered at Police Station Rahon, District SBS Nagar again petitioner and co vide which Section 325 was added against the petitioner upon the MLR of complainant in case FIR No.119, dated 28.08.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149 IPC, register consequential dated 13.02.2019 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/D 11063-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: JASVIR SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Jasinder Singh Sekhon, Advocate Ms. Amrit Kaur Mahir, AAG, Punjab Mr. Inder Preet Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 28.08.2016 (Annexure P-2) under Sections 324, 323, 148 and 149 of IPC, registered at Police Station Rahon, District SBS Nagar again petitioner and co-accused and DDR No.32 dated 31.08.2016 (Annexure P vide which Section 325 was added against the petitioner upon the MLR of complainant in case FIR No.119, dated 28.08.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149 IPC, registered at PS Rahon, District SBS Nagar (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise 13.02.2019 (Annexure P-4). This Court vide order dated 24.04.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11063-2026 Date of decision: 26.05.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Amrit Kaur Mahir, AAG, Punjab. , Advocate for respondent No.2. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of DDR No.18, dated 2) under Sections 324, 323, 148 and 149 of IPC, registered at Police Station Rahon, District SBS Nagar against the present accused and DDR No.32 dated 31.08.2016 (Annexure P-3) vide which Section 325 was added against the petitioner upon the MLR of complainant in case FIR No.119, dated 28.08.2016, under Sections 323, 324, ed at PS Rahon, District SBS Nagar (Annexure P-1) and proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise 24.04.2026 had directed the parties uty Magistrate to get their statements recorded ….Petitioner ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik DDR No.18, dated 2) under Sections 324, 323, 148 and 149 of IPC, st the present 3) vide which Section 325 was added against the petitioner upon the MLR of complainant in case FIR No.119, dated 28.08.2016, under Sections 323, 324, and proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise had directed the parties uty Magistrate to get their statements recorded GURPREET 2026.05.29 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-11063 and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate submitted report dated effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Mr. of respondent No.2 is taken on record. 5. L have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 6. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F 7. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and othe petition is allowed and Sections 324, 323, 148 and 149 of IPC, registered at Police Station Rahon, District SBS Nagar against the present petitioner and co No.32 dated 31.08.2016 (Annexure P against the petitioner upon the MLR of complainant in case FIR No.119, 11063-2026 2 and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, submitted report dated 11.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue Mr. Inder Preet Singh, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf respondent No.2 and has filed his power of attorney in Court today, which is taken on record. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and othe petition is allowed and DDR No.18, dated 28.08.2016 (Annexure P Sections 324, 323, 148 and 149 of IPC, registered at Police Station Rahon, District SBS Nagar against the present petitioner and co ted 31.08.2016 (Annexure P-3) vide which Section 325 was added against the petitioner upon the MLR of complainant in case FIR No.119, and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the , Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, , Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, has to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue , Advocate has put in appearance on behalf and has filed his power of attorney in Court today, which earned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this DDR No.18, dated 28.08.2016 (Annexure P-2) under Sections 324, 323, 148 and 149 of IPC, registered at Police Station Rahon, District SBS Nagar against the present petitioner and co-accused and DDR 3) vide which Section 325 was added against the petitioner upon the MLR of complainant in case FIR No.119, and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, has to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue , Advocate has put in appearance on behalf and has filed his power of attorney in Court today, which earned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court , this 2) under Sections 324, 323, 148 and 149 of IPC, registered at Police Station Rahon, accused and DDR 3) vide which Section 325 was added against the petitioner upon the MLR of complainant in case FIR No.119, GURPREET 2026.05.29 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-11063 dated 28.08.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149 IPC, registered at PS Rahon, District SBS Nagar (Annexure P arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 4) are quashed. 8. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 26.05.2026 Gurpreet 11063-2026 3 dated 28.08.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149 IPC, registered at PS Rahon, District SBS Nagar (Annexure P-1) arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No dated 28.08.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149 IPC, registered at PS 1) and consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 13.02.2019 (Annexure P- Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No dated 28.08.2016, under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149 IPC, registered at PS proceedings - Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.29 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.