PARMINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/26365/2026 · 2026-05-27
Rupinderjit Chahal
Transfer Petitionbody2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 5509 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 5509 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-26365
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 319
PARMINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present: Mr. G.S. Dhillon, for the petitioners.
Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab.
Ms. Garima Thappa, for respondent No.2.
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 19.02.2026, under Sections 316(2) BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Kiratpur Sahib, District Roopnagar (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated (Annexure P-2
2.
This parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and genuineness of the compromise. 26365-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM
Date of decision:
PARMINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. G.S. Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Garima Thappa, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 19.02.2026, under Sections 316(2) BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Kiratpur Sahib, District Roopnagar (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 2). This Court vide its order dated parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-26365-2026 Date of decision: 27.05.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.25, dated 19.02.2026, under Sections 316(2) BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Kiratpur Sahib, District Roopnagar (Annexure P-1) and consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 15.04.2026
order dated 11.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the
s ....Respondents
Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.25, dated 19.02.2026, under Sections 316(2) BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station sequential 15.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the GURPREET 2026.05.28 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-26365
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties Judicial Magistrate First Class recorded. On the Class, Sri Anandpur Sahib, effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the ins
6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab an petition is allowed and BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Kiratpur Sahib, District Roopnagar (Annexure P-1) of compromise dated
7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 27.05.2026 Gurpreet
26365-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sri Anandpur Sahib, recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, , Sri Anandpur Sahib, has submitted report dated effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the ins Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 petition is allowed and FIR No.25, dated 19.02.2026, under Sections 316(2) BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Kiratpur Sahib, District Roopnagar 1) and consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the bas of compromise dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before , Sri Anandpur Sahib, and got their statements basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First has submitted report dated 22.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily
Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court d others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this FIR No.25, dated 19.02.2026, under Sections 316(2) BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Kiratpur Sahib, District Roopnagar proceedings arising therefrom on the basis (Annexure P-2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL)
JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No
have appeared before and got their statements Judicial Magistrate First to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court , this FIR No.25, dated 19.02.2026, under Sections 316(2) BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Kiratpur Sahib, District Roopnagar is Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.28 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.