CRM-M-31398 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (178 ) RAVINDER SINGH ALIAS RAVI STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present : Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, Punjab MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur in case arising out of FIR No.139 dated 24.07.2023 registered under Sections 379 B, 323, 120B, 411 of IPC at Police Station Lehra, District Sangrur whereby his bal was cancelled a arrest were ordered to be issued against him. Now proclamation proceedings have been initiated against him and proclamation is ordered to be issued for 04.07.2026. 2. It is argued by learned counsel for t absence on 07.04.2026 was not intentional but was due to noting down of wrong date of hearing in his diary. His absence before the Learned Trial 31398-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision : 27.05.2026 RAVINDER SINGH ALIAS RAVI Versus STATE OF PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur in case arising out of FIR No.139 dated 24.07.2023 registered under Sections 379 B, 323, 120B, 411 of IPC at Police Station Lehra, District Sangrur whereby his bal was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State. Warrant of arrest were ordered to be issued against him. Now proclamation proceedings have been initiated against him and proclamation is ordered to be issued for 04.07.2026. It is argued by learned counsel for t absence on 07.04.2026 was not intentional but was due to noting down of wrong date of hearing in his diary. His absence before the Learned Trial IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-31398-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.05.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, Punjab The petitioner is seeking quashing of order dated 07.04.2026 passed by the Court of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur in case arising out of FIR No.139 dated 24.07.2023 registered under Sections 379- B, 323, 120B, 411 of IPC at Police Station Lehra, District Sangrur whereby nd bonds were forfeited to the State. Warrant of arrest were ordered to be issued against him. Now proclamation proceedings have been initiated against him and proclamation is ordered to It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that his absence on 07.04.2026 was not intentional but was due to noting down of wrong date of hearing in his diary. His absence before the Learned Trial AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.28 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-31398 Court was not intentional but due to the reason to join proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him. It is, therefore, argued that the petition deserves to be allowed. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Learned State cou asking of the Court and is ready to argue the matter. It is argued by learned State counsel that there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order. It is also argued that even proclamation proceedings ha issued against the petitioner. It is thus, stressed that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. 5. This Court has heard the rival submissions made by the parties. 6. The petitioner had absented himself on 07.04.2026 and thereafter his bail was cancelled and now proclamation proceedings have been initiated against him. Though this Court does not find any or irregularity in the impugned order however, keeping in view the fact proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and terms and conditions to be imposed upon him by the Trial Court, the petition is disposed of by giving direction to the petitioner to surrender before the Trial 31398-2026 (O&M) (2) Court was not intentional but due to the reason to join proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him. It is, therefore, argued that the petition deserves to be allowed. Notice of motion. Learned State counsel accepts notice of the petition on the asking of the Court and is ready to argue the matter. It is argued by learned State counsel that there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order. It is also argued that even proclamation proceedings ha issued against the petitioner. It is thus, stressed that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. This Court has heard the rival submissions made by the The petitioner had absented himself on 07.04.2026 and his bail was cancelled and now proclamation proceedings have been initiated against him. Though this Court does not find any or irregularity in the impugned order passed by the Learned Trial Court, however, keeping in view the fact the petition proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and terms and conditions to be imposed upon him by the Trial Court, the petition is disposed of by giving direction to the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate/Vacation Judge Court was not intentional but due to the reason narrated above. He is ready to join proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him. It is, therefore, argued that nsel accepts notice of the petition on the asking of the Court and is ready to argue the matter. It is argued by learned State counsel that there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order. It is also argued that even proclamation proceedings have already been issued against the petitioner. It is thus, stressed that the petition does not This Court has heard the rival submissions made by the The petitioner had absented himself on 07.04.2026 and his bail was cancelled and now proclamation proceedings have been initiated against him. Though this Court does not find any illegality passed by the Learned Trial Court, the petitioner is ready to join the proceedings before the Learned Trial Court and is ready to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed upon him by the Trial Court, the petition is disposed of by giving direction to the petitioner to surrender Magistrate/Duty Magistrate/Vacation Judge within a period AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.28 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-31398 of 10 days from today and on doing so and furnishing fresh personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of further on depositing cost to the tune of Rs.10,000/ Legal Services Authority (DLSA), the Trial Court. 7. A copy of this order be sent to the Learned Trial Court. 27.05.2026 Amit Sharma 31398-2026 (O&M) (3) of 10 days from today and on doing so and furnishing fresh personal as well as surety bonds to the satisfaction of the aforementioned Court(s) further on depositing cost to the tune of Rs.10,000/ Legal Services Authority (DLSA), Sangrur, he shall be admitted to bail by the Trial Court. A copy of this order be sent to the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No of 10 days from today and on doing so and furnishing fresh personal as the aforementioned Court(s) and further on depositing cost to the tune of Rs.10,000/- before the District , he shall be admitted to bail by A copy of this order be sent to the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.28 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.