CRM-M-18416 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (229 ) CHETNA @ CHETNA SINGH AND ANR STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana Mr. Tapish Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2 MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) for quashing of FIR No.469 dated 22.12.2023 registered under Sections 384 and 120B of IPC at Police Station Sector 50, Gurugram and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2 (Annexure P-2). 2. This Court vide order dated 06.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 18416-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision : 29.05.2026 CHETNA @ CHETNA SINGH AND ANR Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana Mr. Tapish Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2 **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of arik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) for quashing of FIR No.469 dated 22.12.2023 registered under Sections 384 and 120B of IPC at Police Station Sector 50, Gurugram and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2 2). This Court vide order dated 06.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRM-M-18416-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana Mr. Tapish Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2-complainant The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of arik Suraksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) for quashing of FIR No.469 dated 22.12.2023 registered under Sections 384 and 120B of IPC at Police Station Sector 50, Gurugram and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2026 This Court vide order dated 06.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send his report qua the genuineness AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-18416 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submi compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum o 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 Supreme Court in 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.469 dated 22.12.2023 registered under Sections 384 and 120B of IPC at Police Station Sector 50, Gurugram and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure P petitioners. 29.05.2026 Amit Sharma 18416-2026 (O&M) (2) Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 14.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) , this petition is allowed and FIR No.469 dated 22.12.2023 registered under Sections 384 and 120B of IPC at Police Station Sector 50, Gurugram and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure P (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned tted report dated 14.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 f compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and and approved by the Hon’ble Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) , this petition is allowed and FIR No.469 dated 22.12.2023 registered under Sections 384 and 120B of IPC at Police Station Sector 50, Gurugram and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.