CRM-M-24669 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 203 HIMANSHU YADAV STATE OF HARYANA CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Ms. Parbeen Kumari Dharwal, Advocate for Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case Sections 108 and 3(5) of BNS at Police Stati 2. On the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.81 dated 06.05.2025 108 and 3(5) of BNS at Police Station Rampura, District Rewari. petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and no offence, as alleged, is made out against the p bare perusal of the FIR. He submits that no overt act has been 24669-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: HIMANSHU YADAV Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Parbeen Kumari Dharwal, Advocate for Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.81 dated 06.05.2025 registered under Sections 108 and 3(5) of BNS at Police Station Rampura, District Rewari On 21.05.2026, the following order “Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.81 dated 06.05.2025 108 and 3(5) of BNS at Police Station Rampura, District Rewari. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and no offence, as alleged, is made out against the p bare perusal of the FIR. He submits that no overt act has been IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24669-2026 Date of decision: 29.05.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Parbeen Kumari Dharwal, Advocate for Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana. Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner FIR No.81 dated 06.05.2025 registered under on Rampura, District Rewari. following order was passed by this Court: - Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.81 dated 06.05.2025 registered under Sections 108 and 3(5) of BNS at Police Station Rampura, District Rewari. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and no offence, as alleged, is made out against the petitioner from the bare perusal of the FIR. He submits that no overt act has been ….Petitioner ....Respondent Through the instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioner FIR No.81 dated 06.05.2025 registered under Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner registered under Sections Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and no etitioner from the bare perusal of the FIR. He submits that no overt act has been GURPREET 2026.05.29 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-24669 attributed to the petitioner and there was no monetary transaction or dealing between the petitioner and the deceased Manoj Kumar. He further submitted that, the dispute, in between the deceased and the co regarding a property transaction and the petitioner has unnecessarily been dragged into the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the deceased allegedly committed suicide on 06.05 said property dispute and there is no allegation showing any direct role of the petitioner in the occurrence. It is further submitted that no recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. He submits that th involved in any other case. Learned counsel for the further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating agency. status report in the matter, which is taken on record and while referring to the status report, has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, by submitting that the allegations levelled agains investigation within a week from today and would appear as and when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with the Investigating A admitted to interim bail on furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioners shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 202 24669-2026 2 attributed to the petitioner and there was no monetary transaction or dealing between the petitioner and the deceased Manoj Kumar. He further submitted that, the dispute, in between the deceased and the co regarding a property transaction and the petitioner has unnecessarily been dragged into the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the deceased allegedly committed suicide on 06.05.2025 due to mental pressure arising out of the said property dispute and there is no allegation showing any direct role of the petitioner in the occurrence. It is further submitted that no recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner has clean antecedents as he is not involved in any other case. Learned counsel for the further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating agency. On the other hand, learned State counsel has filed the status report in the matter, which is taken on record and while referring to the status report, has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, by submitting that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are serious in nature. List on 29.05.2026. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join investigation within a week from today and would appear as and when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with the Investigating Agency. In the event of arrest, he shall be admitted to interim bail on furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioners shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.” attributed to the petitioner and there was no monetary transaction or dealing between the petitioner and the deceased Manoj Kumar. He further submitted that, the dispute, in fact was between the deceased and the co-accused Rajender Saini regarding a property transaction and the petitioner has unnecessarily been dragged into the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the deceased allegedly committed .2025 due to mental pressure arising out of the said property dispute and there is no allegation showing any direct role of the petitioner in the occurrence. It is further submitted that no recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. e petitioner has clean antecedents as he is not involved in any other case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the On the other hand, learned State counsel has filed the status report in the matter, which is taken on record and while referring to the status report, has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, by submitting that the allegations levelled t the petitioner are serious in nature. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join investigation within a week from today and would appear as and when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with gency. In the event of arrest, he shall be admitted to interim bail on furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioners shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section attributed to the petitioner and there was no monetary transaction or dealing between the petitioner and the deceased fact was accused Rajender Saini regarding a property transaction and the petitioner has unnecessarily been dragged into the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the deceased allegedly committed .2025 due to mental pressure arising out of the said property dispute and there is no allegation showing any direct role of the petitioner in the occurrence. It is further submitted that no recovery is to be effected from the petitioner. e petitioner has clean antecedents as he is not petitioner further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so by the On the other hand, learned State counsel has filed the status report in the matter, which is taken on record and while referring to the status report, has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, by submitting that the allegations levelled In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join investigation within a week from today and would appear as and when required by the Investigating Officer and cooperate with gency. In the event of arrest, he shall be admitted to interim bail on furnishing of bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioners shall also abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section GURPREET 2026.05.29 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-24669 3. L the order dated investigation. 4. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions Singh has submitted that the petitioner ha longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS 29.05.2026 Gurpreet 24669-2026 3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 21.05.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner ha investigation. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and longer required for further investigation. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated 21.05.2026 passed by this Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No earned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from SI Karan joined the investigation and is no In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the passed by this Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE speaking/reasoned? Yes/No earned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of joined the SI Karan no In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the passed by this Court, is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.29 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.