Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P(MD)No.15421 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P(MD)No.15421 of 2023 R.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Labour and Employment Department, St.George Fort, Chennai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, O/o. Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Bharathiula Street, Near Lotus Tank, K.Pudur, Madurai-2. 3.The Management, The Metal Powder Company, Maravankulam, Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District-625 706. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to take action under Section 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.15421 of 2023 25 T and U of Industrial Disputes act against the third respondent for the unfair labour practice committed by them. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ravichandran For R-1 : Mrs.K.R.Shivashankari, Counsel for State For R-3 : Mr.M.N.Ramkumar ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to take action under Sections 25-T and 25-U of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, against the third respondent for the alleged unfair labour practices committed by them. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was employed under the third respondent. Subsequently, his services were terminated. Challenging the order of termination, the petitioner raised an industrial dispute, which came to be allowed in his favour. Thereafter, the third 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.15421 of 2023 respondent transferred the petitioner to Madhya Pradesh. According to the petitioner, the said transfer is mala fide and has been effected by way of victimisation, amounting to an unfair labour practice under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a complaint dated 06.09.2022 before the second respondent seeking action under Sections 25-T and 25-U of the Industrial Disputes Act. Since no orders have been passed on the said complaint, the present writ petition has been filed. 4. Considering the limited relief sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the allegations, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 06.09.2022 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the third respondent, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.
With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 10.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No TSG 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.15421 of 2023 To 1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Labour and Employment Department, St.George Fort, Chennai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, O/o. Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Bharathiula Street, Near Lotus Tank, K.Pudur, Madurai-2. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.15421 of 2023 M.DHANDAPANI, J. TSG W.P(MD)No.15421 of 2023 10.07.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis