CRM-M-24485 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 269 NARESH SHARMA AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Mayur Karkra, for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Pooja Jaglan, for respondent Nos.2 and 3. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 13.10.2017, registered under Sections 318(4), 351(3) BN Civil Line Kaithal, District Kaithal, (Annexure P under Section 193 BNS dated 15.03.2018 (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated (Annexure P-5 2. This parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 24485-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: NARESH SHARMA AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Mayur Karkra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Ms. Pooja Jaglan, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 13.10.2017, registered under Sections 318(4), 351(3) BN Kaithal, District Kaithal, (Annexure P under Section 193 BNS dated 15.03.2018 (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 5). This Court vide its order dated parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24485-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.05.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.376, dated 13.10.2017, registered under Sections 318(4), 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Kaithal, District Kaithal, (Annexure P-1) and challan/final report under Section 193 BNS dated 15.03.2018 (Annexure P-4) and consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 18.10.2025 rder dated 04.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.376, dated S, at Police Station 1) and challan/final report consequential 18.10.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the GURPREET 2026.05.29 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-24485 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid ord Judicial Magistrate First Class the basis of the statements so recorded, Kaithal, has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 petition is allowed and Sections 318(4), 351(3) BN Kaithal, (Annexure P dated 15.03.2018 (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of compromise dated quashed. 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 29.05.2026 Gurpreet 24485-2026 (O&M) 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kaithal and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class has submitted report dated 15.05.2026 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab an another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 petition is allowed and FIR No.376, dated 13.10.2017, registered under Sections 318(4), 351(3) BNS, at Police Station Civil Line Kaithal, (Annexure P-1) and challan/final report under Section 193 BNS dated 15.03.2018 (Annexure P-4) and consequential therefrom on the basis of compromise dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No er, parties have appeared before and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate First Class, 15.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this FIR No.376, dated 13.10.2017, registered under ation Civil Line Kaithal, District 1) and challan/final report under Section 193 BNS consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 18.10.2025 (Annexure P-5) are Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No have appeared before and got their statements recorded. On , to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment d another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court , this FIR No.376, dated 13.10.2017, registered under Kaithal, District 1) and challan/final report under Section 193 BNS proceedings arising are Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.29 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.