CRM-M-27218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 260 RAMESH KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Jashmed Ahmed, for the petitioner. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Inderjeet Singh, for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated (Annexure P-3 2. This parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 27218-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: RAMESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Jashmed Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Inderjeet Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 3). This Court vide its order dated parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27218-2026 Date of decision: 29.05.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.240, dated 08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P-1) and consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 05.05.2026 order dated 14.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the ….Petitioner ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.240, dated 08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at consequential 05.05.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the GURPREET 2026.05.29 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-27218 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, dated 22.05.2026 the parties voluntarily and without any coe 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before t 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh petition is allowed and Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of compromise dated quashed. 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 29.05.2026 Gurpreet 27218-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, s recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, 22.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 petition is allowed and FIR No.240, dated 08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P-1) and consequential therefrom on the basis of compromise dated Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, and got their s recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sub Division Bilaspur, has submitted report to the effect that the compromise has been effected between rcion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to he trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this FIR No.240, dated 08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 05.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) are Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE speaking/reasoned? Yes/No have appeared before Sub and got their Sub has submitted report to the effect that the compromise has been effected between Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court , this FIR No.240, dated 08.08.2021, registered under Sections 506, 471, 468, 467, 420 and 409 IPC, at Police Station Bilaspur, ings arising are Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.29 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.