VISHALDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/20702/2026 · 2026-05-22
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 5455 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 5455 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-20702
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 274
VISHALDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar,
Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 31.07.2023, registered under Sections 452, 427, 506, 149 IPC at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) (Annexure P 30.07.2023, under Sections 323, 452, 427, 149 IPC, at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of
2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 20702-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM
Date of decision:
VISHALDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 31.07.2023, registered under Sections 452, 427, 506, 149 IPC at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) (Annexure P-1) recorded in FIR 30.07.2023, under Sections 323, 452, 427, 149 IPC, at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) (Annexure P-2) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2025 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 20.04.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20702-2026 Date of decision: 22.05.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL for the petitioners. Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of GD No.12, dated 31.07.2023, registered under Sections 452, 427, 506, 149 IPC at PS Majitha, 1) recorded in FIR No.127, dated 30.07.2023, under Sections 323, 452, 427, 149 IPC, at PS Majitha, District subsequent proceedings arising compromise dated 24.03.2025 (Annexure P-3).
20.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness
s ....Respondents
Bharatiya Nagarik GD No.12, dated 31.07.2023, registered under Sections 452, 427, 506, 149 IPC at PS Majitha, No.127, dated 30.07.2023, under Sections 323, 452, 427, 149 IPC, at PS Majitha, District subsequent proceedings arising had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.05.27 19:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-20702
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, par Judicial Magistrate First Class On the basis of the statements so recorded, Amritsar has submitted report dated compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of t continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 petition is allowed and Sections 452, 427, 506, 149 IPC at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) (Annexure P-1) recorded in FIR No.127, dated 30.07.2023, under Sections 323, 452, 427, 149 IPC, at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) ( 2) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 24.03.2025 (Annexure P
7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 22.05.2026 Gurpreet
20702-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, par Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amritsar and got their statements recorded.
On the basis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated 02.05.2026 mpromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 petition is allowed and GD No.12, dated 31.07.2023, registered under Sections 452, 427, 506, 149 IPC at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) 1) recorded in FIR No.127, dated 30.07.2023, under Sections 323, 452, 427, 149 IPC, at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) ( subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 24.03.2025 (Annexure P-3) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 02.05.2026 to the effect that the mpromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. he above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this GD No.12, dated 31.07.2023, registered under Sections 452, 427, 506, 149 IPC at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) 1) recorded in FIR No.127, dated 30.07.2023, under Sections 323, 452, 427, 149 IPC, at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) (Annexure P- subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL)
JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
ties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. , to the effect that the mpromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without .2 he above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court , this GD No.12, dated 31.07.2023, registered under Sections 452, 427, 506, 149 IPC at PS Majitha, District Amritsar (Rural) 1) recorded in FIR No.127, dated 30.07.2023, under Sections - compromise Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.27 19:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.