Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5437 (MAD)

Selva Chiranjeevi S v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/27822/2023 · 2026-07-20

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.27822 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.(MD)No.27822 of 2023 S.Selva Chiranjeevi ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin. 2.The Sub Divisional Officer & Sub Collector, Tuticorin. 3.D.Renuga 4.M.Bala ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent in Moo.Mu.(C1)/e-1201229/2023 dated 06.10.2023 to quash the same and consequently direct him to secure the property of the petitioner from respondents 3 & 4. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.27822 of 2023 For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sundaresan For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.R.Ramasamy, Counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu For Respondents 3 & 4 : No appearance O R D E R The present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order of the first respondent in Moo.Mu.(C1)/e-1201229/2023 dated 06.10.2023. 2.Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has handed over some money and jewels to her daughters, which were not returned to the petitioner. Thereby, the petitioner made a petition on 23.01.2023, before the first respondent under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The said petition was forwarded to the Revenue Division Officer, who after conducting an enquiry passed an order dated 11.07.2023, dismissing the petition. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred appeal before the first respondent, who in turn by order dated 06.10.2023 confirmed the order of the Revenue Divisional Officer. Hence, the present Writ Petition. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.27822 of 2023 3.Learned Counsel for the petitioner would further submit that though the petitioner has challenged the order of the first respondent, this Court may permit the petitioner to file appropriate complaint before the appropriate authority. 4.Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 5.In view of the submission made by the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed, directing the petitioner to file appropriate complaint before the appropriate authority in the manner known to law, under the relevant Act and not in terms of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. There shall be no order as to costs. 20.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No MR ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.27822 of 2023 To 1.The District Collector, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin. 2.The Sub Divisional Officer & Sub Collector, Tuticorin. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.27822 of 2023 M.DHANDAPANI, J. MR W.P.(MD)No.27822 of 2023 20.07.2026 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis