Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5409 (PNJ)

GURPREET KAUR v. M/S BHANDARI FINANCE AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/27354/2026 · 2026-05-14

Surya Partap Singh

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 138 GURPREET KAUR M/S BHANDARI FINANCE SUKHDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA P Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 05.12.2025 proclaimed person of learned referred to as ‘trial Court’ No.NACT/242/2022, titled as ‘M/s Bhandari Finance versus Gurpreet Kaur’ for the commissio Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. 3. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab -27354-2026(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH GURPREET KAUR VERSUS M/S BHANDARI FINANCE SUKHDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P Mr. Daljeet Singh Randhawa, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Manaise, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’, seeking 05.12.2025 (Annexure P-4), whereby the petitioner has been declared a proclaimed person. The abovementioned order learned Judicial Magistrate First Class referred to as ‘trial Court’ only, in a complaint case No.NACT/242/2022, titled as ‘M/s Bhandari Finance versus Gurpreet Kaur’ the commission of offence punishable Negotiable Instruments Act.. Notice of motion. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27354-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 14.05.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS M/S BHANDARI FINANCE SUKHDA ENCLAVE & ANR. .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Daljeet Singh Randhawa, Advocate for Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of ‘the Bharatiya ’, seeking for quashing of order dated whereby the petitioner has been declared a . The abovementioned order has been passed by the Court Judicial Magistrate First Class Gurdaspur, hereinafter being , in a complaint case, i.e. case No.NACT/242/2022, titled as ‘M/s Bhandari Finance versus Gurpreet Kaur’ punishable under Section 138 of the Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on (O&M) .2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS Bharatiya for quashing of order dated whereby the petitioner has been declared a Court being , i.e. case No.NACT/242/2022, titled as ‘M/s Bhandari Finance versus Gurpreet Kaur’ Section 138 of the Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, accepts notice on VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.14 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- behalf of respondent dispensed with. However, n learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition -27354-2026(O&M) behalf of respondent/State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with. However, no formal reply has been filed by the State and the learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition 2 /State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby formal reply has been filed by the State and the learned State counsel has opted to orally oppose the present petition. /State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby formal reply has been filed by the State and the VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.14 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- Vinod -27354-2026(O&M) 3 VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.14 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document