CRM-M-15478 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 306 ROHTAS AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Parminder Singh, Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 12.09.2023, under Sections 303, 3(5) BNS, registered at PS Old Industrial Panipat, District Panipat, (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Mag of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the District and Sessions Judge, Panipat, the basis of the statements so recorded, 15478-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: ROHTAS AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 12.09.2023, under Sections 303, 3(5) BNS, registered at PS Old Industrial Panipat, District Panipat, (Annexure P-1) and therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 14.03.2026 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 24.04.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the District and Sessions Judge, Panipat, and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, District and Sessions Judge, Panipat IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15478-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.05.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.579, dated 12.09.2023, under Sections 303, 3(5) BNS, registered at PS Old Industrial 1) and subsequent proceedings arising compromise dated 14.03.2026 (Annexure P-2). 24.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded istrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On District and Sessions Judge, Panipat s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.579, dated 12.09.2023, under Sections 303, 3(5) BNS, registered at PS Old Industrial proceedings arising had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded istrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On District and Sessions Judge, Panipat GURPREET 2026.05.19 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-15478 has submitted report dated been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any co undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh petition is allowed and 3(5) BNS, registered at PS Old Industrial Panipat, District Panipat, (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising ther compromise dated 14.03.2026 (Annexure P 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. 18.05.2026 Gurpreet 15478-2026 (O&M) 2 has submitted report dated 06.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any co undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 petition is allowed and FIR No.579, dated 12.09.2023, under Sections 303, 3(5) BNS, registered at PS Old Industrial Panipat, District Panipat, (Annexure subsequent proceedings arising ther compromise dated 14.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this FIR No.579, dated 12.09.2023, under Sections 303, 3(5) BNS, registered at PS Old Industrial Panipat, District Panipat, (Annexure subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No to the effect that the compromise has ercion or Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court , this FIR No.579, dated 12.09.2023, under Sections 303, 3(5) BNS, registered at PS Old Industrial Panipat, District Panipat, (Annexure efrom on the basis of Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.19 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.