IN THE 215 Kamal Kumar State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. Mr. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik petitioner in case Sections 309(4), Station Balachaur, 2. Learned that the case of accused Roop Chand vide order dated 3. Learned contention of the 4. I have respective parties. 5. In view that co-accused regular bail vide thus with a view THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26358 Date of decision: VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD . Sahil Chaudhary, Advocate for the Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr.DAG, Punjab ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant first petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for case bearing FIR No.09 dated 317(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Balachaur, District SBS Nagar. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would be very similar Chand to whom regular bail has dated 27.04.2026 passed in CRM-M-21765 Learned State Counsel does not dispute the petitioner. have heard learned counsel appearing parties. view of the facts noticed above and Roop Chand has already been vide order dated 27.04.2026 passed view to extend parity and keeping PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 26358-2026(O&M) decision: 14.05.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ the petitioner. Punjab. filed under Section 483 of the grant of regular bail to the 15.01.2026 registered under Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police behalf of the petitioner contends similar to the case of the co- has been granted by this Court 21765-2026. dispute the abovementioned appearing on behalf of the and taking into consideration been granted the concession of passed in CRM-M-21765-2026, keeping the case of the present SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.15 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 215 CRM-M-26358-2026(O&M) petitioner at par with the co-accused, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. 6. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly. 8. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material. 9. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 14.05.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.15 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document