CRM-M-13009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 251 RAJ KUMAR AND ORS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Berwal, Advocate RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 30.09.2017, under Sections 191(3), 115(2), 351(2)(3) of BNS (117(2) BNS) Arms Act deleted later on), registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, (Annexure P-1) and compromise dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P 2. This to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its re of the compromise. 13009-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: RAJ KUMAR AND ORS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Berwal, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 7. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of 30.09.2017, under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 506 of IPC 191(3), 115(2), 351(2)(3) of BNS) and Section 25 of Arms Act (Sections and 326 (118(2) BNS) of IPC added later on and Section 25 of Arms Act deleted later on), registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on t compromise dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P-2). This Court vide order dated 30.04.2026 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its re of the compromise. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13009-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.05.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. for respondent Nos.2 to 7. This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik for quashing of FIR No.408, dated 147, 148, 323 and 506 of IPC (Sections 191(2), and Section 25 of Arms Act (Sections 325 added later on and Section 25 of Arms Act deleted later on), registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 2). 30.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness s ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik FIR No.408, dated 191(2), 325 added later on and Section 25 of Arms Act deleted later on), registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, he basis of had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded port qua the genuineness GURPREET 2026.05.19 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-13009 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Class, Pataudi, Gurugram that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for 7 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 petition is allowed and 148, 323 and 506 of IPC (Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(2)(3) of BNS) and Section 25 of Arms Act (Sections 325 (117(2) BNS) and 326 (118(2) BNS) of IPC added later on and Section 25 of registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of (Annexure P-2) 7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, of, accordingly. 15.05.2026 Gurpreet 13009-2026 (O&M) 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pataudi, Gurugram, recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, , Pataudi, Gurugram has submitted report dated that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 allowed and FIR No.408, dated 30.09.2017, under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 506 of IPC (Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(2)(3) of BNS) and Section 25 of Arms Act (Sections 325 (117(2) BNS) and 326 (118(2) BNS) of IPC added later on and Section 25 of registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 2) are quashed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the , Pataudi, Gurugram, and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First has submitted report dated 11.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 to have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this FIR No.408, dated 30.09.2017, under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 506 of IPC (Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(2)(3) of BNS) and Section 25 of Arms Act (Sections 325 (117(2) BNS) and 326 (118(2) BNS) of IPC added later on and Section 25 of Arms Act deleted later on), registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 25.02.2026 Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements agistrate First to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court , this FIR No.408, dated 30.09.2017, under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 506 of IPC (Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(2)(3) of BNS) and Section 25 of Arms Act (Sections 325 (117(2) BNS) and 326 (118(2) Arms Act deleted later on), subsequent compromise dated 25.02.2026 stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.19 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.