CRM-M-57583 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 115+245 SAHIBDEEP SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA P 1. directions to the respondent No against the respondent No.8. 2. the petitioner P-4) before the respondent No the respondent No stipulated time. 3. 57583-2023 (O&M) 7 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH SAHIBDEEP SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PA Mrs. Neeraj Chandel, Advocate for petitioner. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondent No.2 to take legal action and lodge the FIR against the respondent No.8. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioner(s) has filed the representation dated before the respondent No.4. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.4 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-57583-2023 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 15.05.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH . Neeraj Chandel, Advocate for petitioner. as been filed by the petitioner(s) take legal action and lodge the FIR sel representing the petitioner(s) submits that has filed the representation dated 24.11.2020 (Annexure The learned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a (O&M) 15.05.2026 .....PETITIONER(S) .....RESPONDENT(S) for take legal action and lodge the FIR submits that (Annexure The learned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.15 20:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-57583 hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt petitioner Police, Ludhiana police officer not below the rank of however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. be at liberty to representation of the petit level. However, respondent No.4 will have to assess the threat perception and if there is any need, provide protection to the petitioner. 6. 7. Vinod Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 57583-2023 (O&M) 7 2 Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner(s) (Annexure P-4) be disposed of either by the Ludhiana (respondent No.4) or, on assignment by him, police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own However, respondent No.4 will have to assess the threat perception and if there is any need, provide protection to the petitioner. In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one of this order, the representation of ) be disposed of either by the Commissioner of on assignment by him, by any other Deputy Commissioner of Police. It however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.4 shall an independent assessment with regard to contents of an independent decision at his own However, respondent No.4 will have to assess the threat perception and if there is any need, provide protection to the petitioner. In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. :Yes/No : Yes/No Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one of this order, the representation of Commissioner of any other It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with shall an independent assessment with regard to contents of an independent decision at his own However, respondent No.4 will have to assess the threat perception VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.15 20:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document