Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5275 (PNJ)

RANDEEP ALIAS KALA v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/59143/2025 · 2026-02-12

Manisha Batra

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-59143- IN THE H (226) RANDEEP @ KA STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. H MANISHA BATR 1. The 483 of Bharatiya N of regular bail in under Sections 229 2023 (for short “ 2. As pe Court of Ld. Add Deepak etc. On prescription slip which appeared to overwriting. The the veracity of the -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH @ KALA Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Randeep S. Dhull, Advocate for t Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana ****  BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed atiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in case arising out of FIR No.12 ns 229, 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2 “BNS”) at Police Station Civil Lin As per the allegations, the petitioner h d. Additional Sessions Judge, Jind i On 23.05.2025, he appeared in the ca slip from Community Health Centr ared to be forged to the Court on it . The accused-applicant was repeate of the prescription slip but since the JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-59143-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.02.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA  te for the petitioner by the petitioner under Section , 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for grant 129 dated 23.05.2025 registered 340(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, vil Lines Jind, District Jind. ioner had been facing trial before the Jind in case titled as State Versus the case in the Court and produced a Centre, Muwana dated 17.04.2025 t on its bare perusal on account of epeatedly asked by the Court about ce the accused-applicant stuck to his M) 2026 ction grant tered hita, e the ersus ced a 2025 nt of bout o his AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-59143- stand, the same w from Senior Medi was clear that the applicant was in f applicant had pro appearance. Direc provisions of law aforementioned F The petitioner wa admitting his invo 3. It is a the bars since 23.0 will take consider serve any useful p to be a reason fo triable by Magist allowed. 4. Status counsel has argue involved in many serious allegation intimidating the w that the petition do -2025 (O&M) 2 ame was confirmed through the Naib r Medical Officer, Community Health hat the prescription slip allegedly pu as in fact in the name of one Sanjay so ad produced a forged document to s Direction was given to the Police to r f law and to investigate the same. In ned FIR was registered. Investigatio er was arrested on 23.05.2025. He s involvement in the crime. Investigat It is argued by learned counsel for th e 23.05.2025. He is not required for f nsiderable time to conclude. His fu seful purpose. His involvement in oth son for denying benefit of bail to hi agistrate. It is, therefore, urged th Status report and custody certificate h argued that the petitioner is a hab many other cases. He has been convi gations against him. There are ch the witnesses, if extended benefit of tion does not deserve to be allowed. e Naib Court. Report was obtained Health Centre, Muwana whereby it dly put on record by the accused- njay son of Surjeet and the accused- t to seek exemption from personal ice to register FIR under the relevant e. In compliance of that order, the tigation proceedings were initiated. . He suffered disclosure statement estigation now stands concluded. l for the petitioner that he is behind d for further investigation. The trial His further incarceration would not in other cases cannot be considered l to him. The subject offences are ged that the petition deserve to be icate have been filed. Learned State a habitual offender. He has been convicted in some cases. There are are chances of his absconding or efit of bail. It is, therefore, stressed ined by it - - sonal vant r, the ated. ment hind trial not ered s are o be State en e are g or ssed AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-59143- 5. This C at considerable len 6. The p are triable by Ma Investigation has time to conclude a well settled propo of post conviction The object of ja cannot be preven facts, this Court is bail to the petition petitioner is order well as surety bon learned trial Court the following cond -2025 (O&M) 3 This Court has heard the rival submis ble length. The petitioner has been booked for c by Magistrate. He is in custody for n has been concluded. The trial wil lude as only 01 out of 08 witnesses h proposition of law that pre-trial incar viction sentencing and even bail is the ail is to secure appearance of t ntive or punitive. Taking into con ourt is of the considered opinion that etitioner at this stage. Accordingly, t ordered to be released on bail subjec ty bonds to the extent of two sureties urt/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty g conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall not di inducement, threat or promise the facts of the case or tamper in any manner whatsoever. (ii) The petitioner shall not circumstance without permiss ubmissions made by both the parties d for commission of offences which dy for a period of over 08 months. ial will obviously take considerable sses has been examined so far. It is l incarceration should not be replica l is the rule and jail is an exception. the accused during trial, and it to consideration the above discussed n that a case is made out for grant of ngly, the petition is allowed and the subject to his furnishing personal as ureties and to the satisfaction of the e/Duty Magistrate concerned and on not directly or indirectly make any omise to any person acquainted with tamper with the evidence of the case ll not leave the country under any ermission of the learned trial Court. rties hich nths. rable It is plica tion. t ssed nt of d the al as f the d on any with case any AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-59143- 7. In the petitioner, it shall application seekin -2025 (O&M) 4 (iii) The petitioner shall appea of hearing. (iv) The petitioner shall provid be residing after release and without informing the concern (v) The petitioner shall app concerned Police Station whe first Monday of every alterna presence. The concerned SH appearances by the petitioner learned Trial Court about the shall be at liberty to cancel granting opportunity of being (vi) The petitioner shall su furnish details of his cell phon not change his mobile number trial. In the event of there being any FIR t shall be open to the respondent-State seeking cancellation of bail. appear before each and every date provide his address where he would se and shall not change the same oncerned IO/SHO. ll appear before the SHO of the n wherein he is facing trial on the alternate month and shall record his ed SHO in case of any default in itioner shall immediately inform the ut the absence of the petitioner who ancel the bail of the petitioner after being heard. all surrender his passport, if any, ll phone and Aadhaar card, and shall umber(s) during the pendency of the y FIR/complaint lodged against the State to seek redressal by filing an ould same the the d his in the who after any, shall f the t the g an AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-59143- 8. It is, be construed as an and shall not influ 9. Since any, is rendered in 12.02.2026 Amit Sharma   -2025 (O&M) 5 It is, however, clarified that the obse d as an expression of opinion of this C t influence the outcome of the trial in a Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes    e observations made above shall not this Court on the merits of the case ial in any manner.  allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No  l not case n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.