CRM-M-14506 IN T 378 LOVEPREET STATE OF PU CORAM:- HO Present: Mr for Mr Mr for RUPINDERJIT 1. Th Suraksha Sanh 07.11.2023, und Lalru, District S under Section 2 126(2) and 3(5 therefrom on th 2. Th to appear befor and the learned of the comprom 14506-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGAR CR Da EET SINGH ALIAS GOLU AND O Versus F PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPIN Mr. Narsingh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Adesh Pal Singh, AAG, Punjab Mr. Utkarsh Katana, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** ERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Sect Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quash 3, under Section 148, 149, 323, 324 a strict SAS Nagar and consequent charg ction 201, 323, 324, 341 and 34 IPC d 3(5) BNS) (Annexure P-2) and on the basis of compromise dated 21. This Court vide order dated 17.03 before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to arned Magistrate was directed to send promise. PUNJAB & HARYANA IGARH CRM-M-14506-2026 Date of decision: 06.04.2026 ND OTHERS ….Petitioners ....Respondents UPINDERJIT CHAHAL ocate Punjab. r Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik quashing of FIR No.158, dated , 324 and 341 IPC, at Police Station t charge sheet dated 26.03.2024 filed 4 IPC (Section 238, 115(2), 118(1), and subsequent proceedings arising 21.01.2026 (Annexure P-6). 17.03.2026 had directed the parties rate to get their statements recorded o send its report qua the genuineness s ents garik ated ation filed 8(1), ising rties rded ness GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-14506 3. Pur Judicial Magistr On the basis of Dera Bassi has compromise ha any coercion or 4. Lea have not dispute 5. In continue with th 6. Fol of this Court in another 2007 Supreme Court SCC 303, this p Section 148, 14 Nagar and cons 323, 324, 341 a (Annexure P-2) compromise dat 7. Pen of, accordingly. 06.04.2026 Gurpreet 14506-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, pa agistrate First Class, Dera Bassi, and asis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated 02.04 ise has been effected between the p ion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as disputed the factum of compromise bet In view of the above, no useful with the proceedings before the trial C Following the principles laid down ourt in Kulwinder Singh and others 007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 an ourt in Gian Singh Versus State of , this petition is allowed and FIR No 48, 149, 323, 324 and 341 IPC, at Poli d consequent charge sheet dated 26.03 341 and 34 IPC (Section 238, 115(2), 2) and subsequent proceedings ari dated 21.01.2026 (Annexure P-6) Pending miscellaneous application ingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No er, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. ded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 02.04.2026 to the effect that the the parties voluntarily and without ell as counsel for respondent No.2 ise between the parties. useful purpose would be served to trial Court in the instant FIR. d down by the Full Bench judgment hers Versus State of Punjab and 2 and approved by the Hon’ble te of Punjab and others (2012) 10 IR No.158, dated 07.11.2023, under at Police Station Lalru, District SAS 26.03.2024 filed under Section 201, 15(2), 118(1), 126(2) and 3(5) BNS) ngs arising therefrom on the basis of 6) are quashed. lication(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE es/No e the rded. lass, t the thout No.2 d to ment nd ble 10 nder SAS 201, NS) is of osed AL) GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.