Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 5260 (MAD)

S. Mahadevan v. K. Tharpagaraj IAS and another

CONT P/360/2023 · 2026-07-09

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.360 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.07.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Cont.P.No.360 of 2023 S. Mahadevan S/o.Late B.Sankara Subramani Iyer No.187, N.M.Road, Avadi, Chennai - 600 054. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. K. Tharpagaraj IAS Commissioner, Corporation of Avadi, Avadi, Chennai - 600 054. 2. Sivakumar Tahsildar, Avadi, Chennai - 600 054. Contemnor(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the Respondents for wilfully disobeying the order dated 06.01.2022 made in W.P.No.25645 of 2021. __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.360 of 2023 For Petitioner(s): Mr. T.Tharakrishnan For Mr. U.Karunakaran For Contemnor(s): Mr. RA.Gopinath Standing Counsel for R1 Mr. K.Kumaran Government Pleader for R2 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.Arul Murugan,J) This contempt petition has been filed alleging disobedience of the order dated 06.01.2022 in W.P.No.25645 of 2021, wherein, this Court directed second respondent to conduct survey on the properties of petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 in the writ petition and submit a report to first respondent, who was in-charge at that time and also directed that if any violation is found, to take appropriate action after affording reasonable opportunity of personal hearing. 2. First respondent has filed the counter-affidavit, inter alia, stating that as directed by this Court, inspection was conducted on 18.04.2023 and noticed certain deviations and therefore, notice under Section 56(1) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.360 of 2023 Act, 1971 was issued. Aggrieved by the notice issued, private respondents in the writ petition had filed statutory appeal before the Government under Section 80A of the Act. 3. In view of the fact that action has already been initiated and the statutory appeal is pending, we find no disobedience of the order passed by this Court. Hence, the contempt petition is closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 09.07.2026 kpl __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.360 of 2023 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) Cont.P.No.360 of 2023 09.07.2026 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis