IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (106-A) Charanjit Kaur State of Punjab and Anr. CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. BNSS, read with Section 428 BNSS, 2023 for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 18.08.2025 (Annexue P No.54 dated 11.07.2025, under Sections 316(2) and 8 Police Station Women, Amritsar City, District Amritsar. 2. respondent No. 2 and there has been no violation of the conditions of bail by respondent No. 2 impugned order dated 18.08.2025 before the learned trial Court which granted the bail violation of the conditions of bail. 3. the same is dismissed. March 13, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Charanjit Kaur Versus State of Punjab and Anr. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS, read with Section 428 BNSS, 2023 for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 18.08.2025 (Annexue P No.54 dated 11.07.2025, under Sections 316(2) and 8 Police Station Women, Amritsar City, District Amritsar. Since anticipatory bail has been granted to the son of respondent No. 2 and there has been no violation of the conditions of bail by respondent No. 2. Moreover, the petitioner c order dated 18.08.2025 before the learned trial Court which granted the bail to respondent No.2, that too within the limited scope of any violation of the conditions of bail. This Court does not find any merit in t the same is dismissed. March 13, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-73693-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 13.03.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS, read with Section 428 BNSS, 2023 for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 18.08.2025 (Annexue P-5) in case FIR No.54 dated 11.07.2025, under Sections 316(2) and 85 of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Women, Amritsar City, District Amritsar. Since anticipatory bail has been granted to the son of respondent No. 2 and there has been no violation of the conditions of bail , the petitioner could only challenge the order dated 18.08.2025 before the learned trial Court which had , that too within the limited scope of any This Court does not find any merit in the petition, accordingly, (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 13.03.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents The present petition has been filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS, read with Section 428 BNSS, 2023 for cancellation of bail granted 5) in case FIR 5 of BNS, 2023 at Since anticipatory bail has been granted to the son of respondent No. 2 and there has been no violation of the conditions of bail ould only challenge the had , that too within the limited scope of any accordingly, MANJU 2026.03.17 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document