FAO-3384 IN THE HIG 118 Hakam Rajjak and o CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. seeking enha him by the impugned A dated 03.07 Vehicles Ac 2. yet to be iss inordinate de 3. hearing i.e. un-represent put in appear 4. has exhibite litigation. It 84-2023 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FAO Date o Versus and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-injured has pr g enhancement of compensation amo y the learned Motor Accident Cl ned Award dated 10.05.2018 passed 03.07.2017/03.05.2018 filed under les Act, 1988. The matter pertains to the year issued in the same; and the prese delay of 1028 days. Perusal of order-sheet(s) reveal g i.e. 02.05.2025 and 02.02.2026 resented. Today also, even in the seco appearance on behalf of the appellant. A bare reading of the above f xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-3384-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.03.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA as preferred the present appeal n amount of ₹50,000/- awarded to Claims Tribunal, Mewat vide in MACT Case No. 98 of 2017 under Section 166 of the Motor e year 2023 and notice of motion is present appeal has been filed with reveal(s) that on the last 02 dates of 2.2026, the appellant had gone e second round of hearing, none has ellant. ove facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the peal d to vide otor n is with s of one has llant sent the RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-3384 Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is se Court is left prosecution. 5. 6. 18.03.2026 rishu 84-2023 (O&M) -2- has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha el is seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option except t ution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his suing the present matter. Thus, this cept to dismiss the same for non- any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the terly r his this RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.